Summary
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the summary-judgment dismissal of Leslie Hendershot's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against law-enforcement officers and physicians. The court held that record evidence blatantly contradicted Hendershot's account of being shot and therefore defeated his excessive-force and medical-treatment claims. The court also rejected challenges concerning official-capacity claims, hospital surveillance footage, appointment of counsel, and supplemental attachments, and denied the pending motions.
Holdings
- Summary judgment was proper because the record evidence blatantly contradicted Hendershot's version of events, so no reasonable jury could believe his assertions and he could not establish a genuine dispute concerning a violation of clearly established law.
- Summary judgment was proper on Hendershot's claims against the doctors because the record evidence contradicted his account of having gunshot wounds, leaving no genuine dispute of material fact.
- The dismissal of the official-capacity claims against Slovacek was not disturbed because Hendershot failed to brief the issue and thereby effectively abandoned it; the district court had dismissed those claims as barred by sovereign immunity.
- The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Hendershot's motion for production of the hospital surveillance footage.
Questions Presented
- Whether summary judgment was proper on Hendershot's excessive-force claims against the officers in their individual capacities.
- Whether summary judgment was proper on Hendershot's claims against the doctors for allegedly failing to diagnose and treat gunshot wounds.
- Whether the official-capacity claims against Slovacek were properly dismissed as barred by sovereign immunity.
- Whether the district court abused its discretion by denying Hendershot's motion to obtain hospital surveillance video.
- Whether the Fifth Circuit should grant Hendershot's motions for appointment of counsel and leave to file supplemental attachments.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (9)
- Estate of Henson v. Wichita County, 795 F.3d 456, 461 (5th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 243 (2009)(followed)
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)(followed)
- Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007)(followed)
- Holtzclaw v. DSC Communications Corp., 255 F.3d 254, 257-58 (5th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Mapes v. Bishop, 541 F.3d 582, 584 (5th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- American Family Life Assurance Co. of Columbus v. Biles, 714 F.3d 887, 894 (5th Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982)(followed)
- Theriot v. Parish of Jefferson, 185 F.3d 477, 491 n.26 (5th Cir. 1999)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…