Summary
The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of discretionary review of an Appeal Panel decision denying a Business Economic Loss claim under the Deepwater Horizon Settlement Agreement. The court held that the district court properly declined review where the claimant raised only a single-claimant accounting error regarding the treatment of customer mix data, not a recurring issue substantially impacting administration of the agreement. The opinion also clarified that the Customer Mix Test requires comparing non-local customer revenue to total revenue from profit-and-loss statements, and that adverse classification of unreconciled data is consistent with the Settlement Agreement.
Holdings
- The district court did not abuse its discretion because the appeal raised only a single-claimant accounting error, not a recurring issue requiring resolution.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court abused its discretion in declining to review the Appeal Panel's decision affirming the denial of VLCA's BEL claim.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (8)
- In re Oil Spill by Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in Gulf of Mexico, on Apr. 20, 2010, 910 F. Supp. 2d 891 (E.D. La. 2012)(cited)
- In re Deepwater Horizon, 739 F.3d 790 (5th Cir. 2014)(affirmed)
- In re Deepwater Horizon, 632 F. App'x 199 (5th Cir. 2015)(cited)
- Holmes Motors, Inc. v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., 829 F.3d 313 (5th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Claimant ID 100250022 v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., 847 F.3d 167 (5th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Claimant ID 100212278 v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., 848 F.3d 407 (5th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Claimant Id 100227611 v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., No. 18-30396, 2018 WL 6261854 (5th Cir. Nov. 28, 2018)(followed)
- Claimant ID 100123936 v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., No. 17-02480 (E.D. La. May 5, 2017)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.