Parrish v. Premier Directional Drilling, L.P.

Parrish v. Premier Directional Drilling, L.P., 917 F.3d 369 (5th Cir. 2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · February 28, 2019 · No. No. 17-51089

Summary

The Fifth Circuit held that directional-driller consultants were independent contractors, not employees under the FLSA, applying the economic reality test and the five *Silk* factors. The court found that the degree of control, opportunity for profit or loss, skill and initiative, and permanency of the relationship all favored independent contractor status, while the relative investment factor (though favoring employee status) was given little weight. The district court's summary judgment for the plaintiffs was vacated, and judgment was rendered for the defendant; the court did not reach the issue of whether a three-year statute of limitations for willful violations applied.

Holdings

  1. The plaintiffs are independent contractors, not employees, under the FLSA economic reality test.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the plaintiffs were employees or independent contractors under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Disposition

vacated

Cases Cited (24)

  • United States v. Silk, 331 U.S. 704 (1947)(followed)
  • Brock v. Mr. W Fireworks, Inc., 814 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • Hopkins v. Cornerstone Am., 545 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Carrell v. Sunland Constr., Inc., 998 F.2d 330 (5th Cir. 1993)(followed)
  • Thibault v. Bellsouth Telecomm., 612 F.3d 843 (5th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Usery v. Pilgrim Equip. Co., Inc., 527 F.2d 1308 (5th Cir. 1976)(followed)
  • Herman v. Express Sixty-Minutes Delivery Serv., Inc., 161 F.3d 299 (5th Cir. 1998)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986)(followed)
  • Johnson v. Heckmann Water Res. (CVR), Inc., 758 F.3d 627 (5th Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Steele v. Leasing Enters., Ltd., 826 F.3d 237 (5th Cir. 2016)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 24.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…