Rice v. Gonzalez

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · February 2, 2021 · No. 20-20263

Summary

**Rice v. Gonzalez, 5th Cir. 2021** – Habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is not available to challenge conditions of confinement, even during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Fifth Circuit held that a pretrial detainee's claim that jail conditions posed a health risk due to COVID-19 did not attack the fact or duration of his custody, and thus could not proceed via habeas. Such conditions-of-confinement claims must be brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, not habeas corpus. The court affirmed dismissal for failure to state a claim.

Holdings

  1. Habeas corpus relief is not available for conditions of confinement claims; such claims must be brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a pretrial detainee's conditions-of-confinement claim can be raised in a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (8)

  • Pierre v. United States, 525 F.2d 933 (5th Cir. 1976)(followed)
  • Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475 (1973)(followed)
  • Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818 (5th Cir. 1997)(followed)
  • Orellana v. Kyle, 65 F.3d 29 (5th Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • Wilson v. Williams, 961 F.3d 829 (6th Cir. 2020)(distinguished)
  • Valentine v. Collier, 956 F.3d 797 (5th Cir. 2020)(cited)
  • Valentine v. Collier, 978 F.3d 154 (5th Cir. 2020)(cited)
  • Marlowe v. LeBlanc, 810 Fed. App'x 302 (5th Cir. 2020)(cited)

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…