United States v. Pacheco-Ortuna

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · January 28, 2021 · No. 20-40471

Summary

**United States v. Pacheco-Ortuna, 5th Cir. 2021 (unpublished).** Anders appeal dismissed as frivolous; counsel’s motion to withdraw granted. Ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims declined on direct appeal due to insufficient record, without prejudice to collateral review under *United States v. Isgar*.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Graves, Willett, and Duncan
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
January 28, 2021
Docket number
20-40471
Procedural posture
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, USDC No. 4:19-CR-172-1. The Federal Public Defender filed an Anders motion to withdraw.
Precedential value
unpublished
Parties
Jose Guadalupe Pacheco-Ortuna v. United States of America
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

criminal procedureappellate procedureineffective assistanceright to counsel

Practice areas

Criminal LawAppellate Procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appeal presents any nonfrivolous issue for appellate review
  2. Whether the defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claims can be considered on direct appeal

Holdings

  1. The appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
  2. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow a fair evaluation of the ineffective assistance claims; the court declines to consider them without prejudice to collateral review.

Key quotations

The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Pacheco-Ortuna’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. (2)
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. (2)

Factual background

The appeal arises from a criminal conviction in the Eastern District of Texas. The underlying facts are not detailed in this opinion.

Procedural history

The defendant was convicted in the district court. He appealed, and appointed counsel filed an Anders brief asserting no nonfrivolous issues.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…