Bassel v. Durand-Day

134 F.4th 846 (5th Cir. 2025) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · April 21, 2025 · No. 23-10956

Summary

This Fifth Circuit opinion addresses whether Chapter 13 debtors must pay off all allowed unsecured claims, including student loans, within the life of their repayment plan when a trustee objects under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1). The court holds that the phrase "under the plan" requires full payment by the end of the applicable commitment period, rejecting the debtors' argument that payments could extend beyond the plan term under § 1322(b)(5). Consequently, the court vacates the lower courts' confirmations of the plans and remands for further proceedings.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Richman; Oldham; Ramirez
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decision date
April 21, 2025
Docket number
23-10956
Procedural posture
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Standard of review
De novo for legal issues; clear error for factual findings
Precedential value
published
Parties
Pam Bassel, Standing Chapter 13 Trustee v. Victoria Florita Durand-Day; Lavonda Latrece Evans
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded

Topics

chapter 13bankruptcystatutory interpretationplain meaning rulecanons of construction

Practice areas

bankruptcy

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the phrase ‘under the plan’ in 11 U.S.C. §1325(b)(1)(A) requires payment of allowed unsecured claims, including student loans, to be completed within the plan’s duration

Holdings

  1. §1325(b)(1)(A) requires that the debtor pay in full all allowed unsecured claims, including student‑loan obligations, within the life of the Chapter 13 plan.

Key quotations

The phrase “under the plan” is undefined, so “we give the term its ordinary meaning.” (at 12)
Statutes are contextual as well as textual. The word ‘under’ is a ‘chameleon’ that must draw its meaning from its context. (at 14)

Factual background

Debtor Victoria Florita Durand-Day and debtor Lavonda Latrece Evans each filed Chapter 13 cases in 2022. Both had above‑median disposable incomes and proposed five‑year plans that listed student‑loan obligations but did not commit to paying those loans in full within the plan term. The bankruptcy trustee objected under §1325(b)(1)(A); the bankruptcy court rejected the objection and confirmed the plans; the district court affirmed.

Procedural history

The bankruptcy court confirmed the Chapter 13 plans despite a trustee objection under 11 U.S.C. §1325(b)(1). The district court affirmed that decision. The Fifth Circuit reviewed de novo the legal conclusions and for clear error the factual findings, vacated the confirmation, and remanded for new plans.

Remand instructions

Allow the debtors to file new Chapter 13 plans that satisfy §1325(b)(1)(A) by paying all allowed unsecured claims, including student‑loan obligations, in full within the plan term.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…