Summary
The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed a final judgment in garnishment ordering Navy Federal Credit Union to release funds held in an account belonging to the judgment debtor. The court held that the garnishee's unrebutted assertion that the account was located in Virginia established a lack of subject matter jurisdiction over the property, requiring reversal and discharge of the writ of garnishment.
Holdings
- Because Navy Federal's amended answer alleged that Crawford's accounts were located outside Florida and Nicholas Financial did not reply, those allegations were deemed true. Florida courts lack jurisdiction over property located outside Florida; therefore, the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enter the final judgment of garnishment.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over the garnished property when Navy Federal's amended answer alleged that Crawford's accounts were located outside Florida.
- Whether the trial court could enter a final judgment of garnishment without resolving the jurisdictional issue raised in the amended answer.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (5)
- Suntrust Bank v. Arrow Energy, Inc., 199 So. 3d 1026, 1028 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)(followed)
- Ruth v. Dep't of Legal Aff., 684 So. 2d 181, 185 (Fla. 1996)(followed)
- Burns v. Dep't of Legal Aff., 147 So. 3d 95, 97 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)(followed)
- First Colony Life Ins. Co. v. Sun State Cap. Funding, Inc., 730 So. 2d 735, 737 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(followed)
- Navy Fed. Credit Union v. Veros Credit, LLC, 396 So. 3d 590, 592 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…