Summary
The Fifth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed Gerald Paul Quaif’s judgment and sentence in an Anders appeal. The court held that correcting a harmless clerical error in the statutory citation for a five percent surcharge is discretionary rather than mandatory, and declined to remand for correction; Judge Wallis concurred in part and dissented in part.
Holdings
- Correcting a clerical error that is harmless to the defendant in an Anders case is, at most, discretionary; the appellate court is not required to remand for correction.
- The court would not remand to correct the erroneous statutory citation because the error was harmless to the defendant and correction was discretionary rather than mandatory.
Questions Presented
- Whether an appellate court must remand an Anders case to correct a harmless clerical error in the defendant's written sentence.
- Whether the incorrect statutory citation for the five-percent surcharge required correction despite the absence of prejudice or reversible error.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (15)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)(followed)
- State v. Causey, 503 So. 2d 321, 322–23 (Fla. 1987)(followed)
- Bush v. State, 354 So. 3d 626, 626 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)(limited)
- Dubuc v. State, 345 So. 3d 961, 962 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)(limited)
- Bailey v. State, 350 So. 3d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)(distinguished)
- Echavarria v. State, 270 So. 3d 527, 528 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)(distinguished)
- Williams v. State, 422 So. 3d 1155, 1164 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025)(followed)
- United States v. Wilmoth, 668 F. App'x 455, 457 (4th Cir. 2016)(followed by analogy)
- United States v. Hill, 358 F. App'x 729, 731 (7th Cir. 2010)(followed by analogy)
- Gadson v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D2314a (Fla. 5th DCA Oct. 24, 2025)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…