Summary
The First Circuit affirmed dismissal of LP Solutions LLC's claims against members of the Duchossois family for lack of specific personal jurisdiction in Maine. The court held that although the defendants knowingly contracted with a Maine company and made some payments to Maine, their contacts did not show purposeful availment because the relationship was initiated by the Maine plaintiff and the defendants' obligations were contingent and limited. The court concluded that exercising jurisdiction would not be reasonably foreseeable under the circumstances.
Holdings
- The defendants' Maine contacts did not constitute purposeful availment of the privilege of conducting activities in Maine, and exercising specific personal jurisdiction would therefore violate due process.
- The court did not need to address the reasonableness prong because LP Solutions failed to establish sufficient minimum contacts and purposeful availment.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Duchossois family purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting activities in Maine such that the exercise of specific personal jurisdiction was reasonably foreseeable and consistent with due process.
- Whether the defendants' Maine contacts satisfied the purposeful-availment component of the First Circuit's specific-personal-jurisdiction test.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (21)
- Copia Commc'ns, LLC v. AMResorts, L.P., 812 F.3d 1, 3, 5 n.3 (1st Cir. 2016)(applied)
- C.W. Downer & Co. v. Bioriginal Food & Sci. Corp., 771 F.3d 59, 64-68 (1st Cir. 2014)(applied)
- A Corp. v. All Am. Plumbing, Inc., 812 F.3d 54, 58 (1st Cir. 2016)(applied)
- Foster-Miller, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox Can., 46 F.3d 138, 147 (1st Cir. 1995)(applied)
- Harlow v. Children's Hosp., 432 F.3d 50, 57, 61 (1st Cir. 2005)(applied)
- International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945)(applied)
- Milliken v. Meyer, 311 U.S. 457, 463 (1940)(applied)
- Plixer Int'l, Inc. v. Scrutinizer GmbH, No. 18-1195, 2018 WL 4357137, at *3 (1st Cir. Sept. 13, 2018)(applied)
- United Elec., Radio & Mach. Workers of Am. v. 163 Pleasant St. Corp., 960 F.2d 1080, 1088-89, 1091 n.11 (1st Cir. 1992)(applied)
- Adams v. Adams, 601 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir. 2010)(applied)
Showing top 10 of 21.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…