Summary
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit denied Carl England's application for supervisory writs. The court noted that his notice of appeal had been granted and that, as an incarcerated pro se prisoner, he could seek review of the ruling on his motion to correct an illegal verdict and sentence without filing a notice of intent to obtain a return date, but should do so within a reasonable time.
Topics
Practice areas
Questions Presented
- Whether an incarcerated pro se prisoner seeking review of a ruling on a motion to correct an illegal verdict and sentence must file a notice of intent to obtain a return date.
- Whether the supervisory writ application should be granted in light of the status of the relator's appeal and the timing of his request for review.
Holdings
- An incarcerated pro se prisoner may seek review of the district court's ruling on a motion to correct an illegal verdict and an illegal sentence without filing a notice of intent to obtain a return date.
- The supervisory writ was denied, although the relator was advised to seek review of the ruling within a reasonable time.
Key quotations
“However, relator should seek review of the ruling at issue within a reasonable time.”
Factual background
Carl England, an incarcerated pro se prisoner, sought review of a ruling on his motion to correct an illegal verdict and an illegal sentence. The St. Tammany Parish Clerk of Court reported that his notice of appeal had been granted and that appeal-filing documentation had later been sent to him. The appellate court concluded that review remained available but denied the writ application.
Procedural history
The district court proceeding was in the Twenty-Second Judicial District Court for St. Tammany Parish, docket number 396443. The appellate court noted that the relator's notice of appeal had been granted on June 27, 2025, and that documentation concerning the appeal had been sent to him on September 18, 2025. The court denied the application for supervisory writs.