Elizabeth Leblanc Schroeder v. Alan Conrad Schroeder

No. 2025 CW 1218 · Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · January 22, 2026 · No. 2025 CW 1218

Summary

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit granted Elizabeth Leblanc Schroeder’s supervisory writ application and vacated the family court’s October 22, 2025 judgment concerning valuation dates for community property interests. The court held that declaratory relief must be pursued through an ordinary proceeding rather than a rule to show cause and that a partial judgment in a contested proceeding did not resolve the underlying controversy.

Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Writing for the Court
McClendon, C.J.; Greene, J.; Stromberg, J.
Jurisdiction
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Decision date
January 22, 2026
Docket number
2025 CW 1218
Procedural posture
Elizabeth Leblanc Schroeder applied for supervisory writs challenging a family court judgment that declared valuation dates for community-property interests in two entities.
Precedential value
Unknown
Parties
Elizabeth Leblanc Schroeder v. Alan Conrad Schroeder
Disposition
vacated

Topics

family law procedurecommunity propertydeclaratory judgmentappellate procedure

Practice areas

family lawcivil procedureappellate procedureremedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a rule to show cause is a proper procedural vehicle for seeking declaratory relief.
  2. Whether the family court could issue a partial declaratory judgment concerning valuation dates while the underlying controversy remained pending.

Holdings

  1. A suit for declaratory judgment is an ordinary action, not a summary proceeding, and a rule to show cause is not the proper procedural vehicle for requesting declaratory relief.
  2. A partial judgment in an otherwise contested proceeding was improper because it did not terminate the uncertainty or controversy giving rise to the proceeding; declaratory judgment should not be used merely to try issues in a pending case.

Key quotations

A suit for a declaratory judgment is an ordinary action, not a summary proceeding.
A rule to show cause is not the proper procedural vehicle to request declaratory relief.
A partial judgment within this otherwise contested proceeding did not terminate the uncertainty or controversy giving rise to the proceeding, and declaratory judgment should not be used to merely try issues in a pending case.

Factual background

The underlying family-law proceeding involved valuation dates for community-property interests in Orthopedic Surgery Center, LLC, and The Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge, Inc. The family court entered a partial judgment declaring those valuation dates while the broader proceeding remained contested.

Procedural history

The Family Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge issued an October 22, 2025 judgment declaring valuation dates for the community-property interests in Orthopedic Surgery Center, LLC, and The Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge, Inc. The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, granted supervisory writs and vacated that judgment because declaratory relief had been sought through an improper summary procedural vehicle and the partial judgment did not terminate the underlying controversy.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…