Summary
The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, granted supervisory writs and reversed a district court judgment denying the defendant's summary judgment motion and granting the plaintiff's motion. The court held that the underlying default judgment was absolutely null because the defendant had not been validly served, and remanded the matter for a trial de novo.
Topics
Practice areas
Questions Presented
- Whether a default judgment rendered against a defendant who was not validly cited and served is absolutely null.
- Whether the evidence established valid personal, domiciliary, or certified-mail service on Ortlieb before the default judgment was rendered.
- Whether the district court judgment concerning the parties' summary-judgment motions should be reversed and the matter remanded for a trial de novo.
Holdings
- A judgment rendered against a defendant who has not been validly cited and served with the petition is absolutely null, even if the defendant had actual notice of the suit.
- Ortlieb was not validly served before the default judgment was rendered because the constable could not effect personal or domiciliary service and the record contained no certified-mail return receipt establishing service.
Key quotations
“Under La. Code Civ. P. art. 1201, a judgment rendered against a defendant who has not been validly cited and served with the petition is absolutely null, even if there is actual notice of the suit.”
“Accordingly, based on the lack of service on defendant prior to rendering the default judgment by the Justice of the Peace Court, we find the default judgment rendered against defendant, Rene Ortlieb, III, is absolutely null.”
Factual background
A constable was unable to serve Ortlieb either personally or domiciliary. The record contained no certified-mail return receipt showing service under the Justice of the Peace Court procedure. Despite the lack of valid service, the Justice of the Peace Court rendered a default judgment against Ortlieb.
Procedural history
The Justice of the Peace Court rendered a default judgment against Ortlieb. In the district court, Ortlieb sought summary judgment, while Kleinpeter Pool Services sought summary judgment. The district court denied Ortlieb's motion and granted the plaintiff's motion. The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit granted Ortlieb's supervisory writ, reversed the district court judgment, and remanded for a trial de novo.
Remand instructions
The matter is remanded to the district court to conduct a trial de novo.