Maximized Marketing, LLC v. Baldwin Motors, Inc.

Maximized Marketing · Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · January 30, 2026 · No. 2025 CW 1118

Summary

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, granted supervisory writs and reversed the district court’s ruling concerning the amount of a suspensive appeal bond. The court held that the bond must include attorneys’ fees awarded in the judgment, because attorneys’ fees are not excluded as costs under Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 2124(B)(1), and remanded for recalculation.

Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Writing for the Court
McClendon, C.J.; Greene, J.; Stromberg, J.
Jurisdiction
Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit
Decision date
January 30, 2026
Docket number
2025 CW 1118
Procedural posture
Brad Pender, as distributee of Maximized Marketing, LLC, applied for supervisory writs from the district court's ruling overruling Maximized Marketing's objection to the amount of the suspensive appeal bond.
Precedential value
Unknown
Parties
Maximized Marketing, LLC, by and through its distributee, Brad Pender v. Baldwin Motors, Inc., d/b/a Baldwin Lincoln and Baldwin Subaru
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded

Topics

writ of certiorariappellate procedurecostsattorney feescivil procedure

Practice areas

appellate procedurecivil procedurecommercial litigation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether attorneys' fees awarded in a money judgment must be included when calculating the security required for a suspensive appeal under Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 2124(B)(1).

Holdings

  1. When a judgment is for a sum of money, the suspensive appeal security must equal the amount of the judgment, including interest allowed by the judgment through the date the security is furnished, exclusive of costs; because attorneys' fees are not costs, awarded attorneys' fees must be included in the bond calculation.

Key quotations

When the judgment is for a sum of money, the amount of the security for a suspensive appeal shall be equal to the amount of the judgment, including the interest allowed by the judgment to the date the security is furnished, exclusive of the costs.
The long standing rule of law is that attorneys’ fees are not included in costs.

Factual background

The underlying judgment awarded a principal sum, interest, and attorneys' fees equal to 33 1/3% of the principal sum. In setting the suspensive appeal bond, the district court excluded the attorneys' fees, and Maximized Marketing objected to the resulting amount.

Procedural history

The Twenty-Second Judicial District Court for St. Tammany Parish overruled Maximized Marketing's objection to the amount of the suspensive appeal bond on July 31, 2025. The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, granted the supervisory writ, reversed the ruling, and remanded for recalculation of the bond.

Remand instructions

The district court must increase the suspensive appeal bond to include a calculation of the attorneys' fees awarded in the judgment at issue.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…