State of Louisiana v. Charles Fair

No. 2026 KW 0132 (La. Ct. App. 2026) · Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · February 5, 2026 · No. 2026 KW 0132

Summary

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit declined to consider Charles Fair's supervisory writ application because counsel failed to comply with affidavit, return-date, and required-document requirements under the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. The court also noted missing portions of the trial transcript and exhibits and stated that supplementation or rehearing would not be considered.

Holdings

  1. A supervisory-writ application that fails to comply with the applicable affidavit, return-date, and filing-content requirements, and that omits materials necessary for review, will not be considered.
  2. Supplementation of the writ application and an application for rehearing would not be considered.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should consider a supervisory-writ application that fails to comply with the affidavit, return-date, and content requirements of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.
  2. Whether the court could adequately review the challenged ruling without the omitted ruling, motion, indictment, court minutes, transcript portions, and exhibits.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (2)

  • City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So.2d 710 (La.)(followed)
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 464 U.S. 896, 104 S.Ct. 246, 78 L.Ed.2d 235(cited)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…