Florida Department of Corrections v. Paulcin

No. 1D2024-0135 · First District Court of Appeal of Florida · March 12, 2025 · No. No. 1D2024-0135

Summary

The First District Court of Appeal of Florida reversed a circuit court order granting Prophet Paulcin’s petition for writ of mandamus concerning an alleged due process violation in a prison disciplinary proceeding. The court held that the circuit court failed to consider whether Paulcin was prejudiced by the alleged violation and remanded for further proceedings.

Holdings

  1. A circuit court may not overturn a prison disciplinary proceeding on the basis of an alleged procedural due process violation without determining whether the error was harmless or prejudicial.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the circuit court erred by granting mandamus based on an alleged due process violation in a prison disciplinary proceeding without determining whether the error prejudiced the inmate.
  2. Whether the circuit court's review of the prison disciplinary action required an appellate harmless-error or prejudice analysis.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (7)

  • Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974)(relied upon)
  • Gardener v. Fla. Dep't of Corr., 178 So. 3d 92, 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)(followed)
  • Gill v. Crosby, 884 So. 2d 442, 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)(followed)
  • Lennear v. Wilson, 937 F.3d 257, 278 (4th Cir. 2019)(persuasive analogy)
  • Howard v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 487 F.3d 808, 813-15 (10th Cir. 2007)(persuasive analogy)
  • Piggie v. Cotton, 344 F.3d 674, 679 (7th Cir. 2003)(persuasive analogy)
  • Powell v. Coughlin, 953 F.2d 744, 750 (2d Cir. 1991)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…