Summary
The First District Court of Appeal of Florida reversed a circuit court order granting Prophet Paulcin’s petition for writ of mandamus concerning an alleged due process violation in a prison disciplinary proceeding. The court held that the circuit court failed to consider whether Paulcin was prejudiced by the alleged violation and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- A circuit court may not overturn a prison disciplinary proceeding on the basis of an alleged procedural due process violation without determining whether the error was harmless or prejudicial.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court erred by granting mandamus based on an alleged due process violation in a prison disciplinary proceeding without determining whether the error prejudiced the inmate.
- Whether the circuit court's review of the prison disciplinary action required an appellate harmless-error or prejudice analysis.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (7)
- Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974)(relied upon)
- Gardener v. Fla. Dep't of Corr., 178 So. 3d 92, 94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)(followed)
- Gill v. Crosby, 884 So. 2d 442, 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)(followed)
- Lennear v. Wilson, 937 F.3d 257, 278 (4th Cir. 2019)(persuasive analogy)
- Howard v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 487 F.3d 808, 813-15 (10th Cir. 2007)(persuasive analogy)
- Piggie v. Cotton, 344 F.3d 674, 679 (7th Cir. 2003)(persuasive analogy)
- Powell v. Coughlin, 953 F.2d 744, 750 (2d Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…