Summary
The First District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed Dalton Reid Jett’s judgment and sentence for burglary of a dwelling and grand theft. The court held that any Alleyne error in determining Jett’s prison releasee reoffender status without submitting the issue to a jury was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because uncontroverted evidence established his qualifying prior release and identity. A concurrence discussed whether the alleged sentencing error was preserved under Florida law.
Holdings
- Any error in failing to submit to a jury the determination that Jett committed the burglary within three years of his release from a prior term of imprisonment was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court violated Alleyne by determining, rather than submitting to a jury, the fact that Jett committed the burglary within three years of release from a prior term of imprisonment for purposes of the prison releasee reoffender sentencing enhancement.
- Whether any Alleyne error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (11)
- Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99, 114–15 (2013)(followed)
- State v. Manago, 375 So. 3d 190, 199 (Fla. 2023)(followed)
- Williams v. State, 242 So. 3d 280, 290 (Fla. 2018)(followed)
- Hicks v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D2238a (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 15, 2025)(followed)
- Dowdell v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D2236c (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 15, 2025)(followed)
- McGlaun v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D2178a (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 1, 2025)(followed)
- Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 19 (1999)(followed by analogy)
- Plott v. State, 148 So. 3d 90 (Fla. 2014)(acknowledged)
- Jackson v. State, 983 So. 2d 562, 574 (Fla. 2008)(discussed)
- Maye v. State, 368 So. 3d 531 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023), rev. granted, No. SC2023-1184, 2024 WL 1796831 (Fla. Apr. 25, 2024)(discussed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…