James v. Hernandez, Premier Construction-Residential, LLC

No. 1D2025-0015 (Fla. 1st DCA May 20, 2026) · First District Court of Appeal of Florida · May 20, 2026 · No. 1D2025-0015

Summary

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed summary judgment for Premier Construction-Residential, LLC in a negligence action arising from a bicycle-vehicle collision. The court held that the record contained no significantly probative evidence that Premier controlled the methods by which Abraham Hernandez, a painting subcontractor, performed his work, rather than merely controlling scheduling, outcomes, and project specifications. Accordingly, Hernandez was an independent contractor and Premier was not vicariously liable for his alleged negligence.

Holdings

  1. Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; evidence that is merely colorable or not significantly probative does not preclude summary judgment.
  2. Premier was not vicariously liable for Hernandez because the record established that Hernandez was an independent contractor, not Premier's agent. The relevant inquiry focused on Premier's right to control the manner and method of Hernandez's work, not merely on Premier's coordination of schedules, deadlines, locations, or desired outcomes.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment to Premier on the issue of whether Hernandez was Premier's agent or an independent contractor.
  2. Whether the evidence that Premier scheduled work, specified paint colors, directed sequencing, addressed repairs, and provided limited training created a genuine dispute of material fact concerning Premier's control over Hernandez's methods of performing the painting work.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (17)

  • Smith v. Westdale Asset Mgmt., Ltd., 353 So. 3d 108, 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Sch. Bd. of Escambia Cnty., 416 So. 3d 427, 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)(followed)
  • In re Amends. to Fla. Rule of Civ. Proc. 1.510, 317 So. 3d 72, 75–76 (Fla. 2021)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249–50 (1986)(followed)
  • Casey v. Mistral Condo. Ass’n, 380 So. 3d 1278, 1286 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)(followed)
  • Del Pilar v. DHL Glob. Customer Sols. (USA), Inc., 993 So. 2d 142, 145–46 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)(followed)
  • Saudi Arabian Airlines Corp. v. Dunn, 438 So. 2d 116, 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)(followed)
  • Gradia v. Baptist Hosp., Inc., 345 So. 3d 385, 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022)(followed)
  • Parker v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., 629 So. 2d 1026, 1027 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)(followed)
  • Villazon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 843 So. 2d 842, 853 n.10, 854 n.11 (Fla. 2003)(discussed)

Showing top 10 of 17.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…