Summary
The Florida First District Court of Appeal reversed an order declaring unlawful a 2024 Alachua County referendum proposing a return to at-large county commission elections. The court held that Florida Statutes section 124.011(10) governs a return from single-member districts to at-large voting and does not require use of the ballot language specified in section 124.011(9)(a).
Holdings
- No. Section 124.011(10), which governs a county's return to the procedures otherwise provided by law, applies to a referendum returning from single-member districts to at-large voting. Because subsection (10) references only the procedure in subsection (3), and subsection (3) does not prescribe ballot wording, subsection (9)(a)'s specific wording is not required.
- The ballot language did not violate section 124.011, and the trial court erred in declaring the referendum unlawful.
Questions Presented
- Whether section 124.011 required a referendum proposing a return from single-member districts to at-large county-commissioner elections to use the specific ballot language prescribed in section 124.011(9)(a).
- Whether the 2024 referendum ballot language violated section 124.011.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (3)
- State v. Rogers, 391 So. 3d 661 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)(followed)
- Ham v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC, 308 So. 3d 942 (Fla. 2020)(followed)
- Univ. of Fla. Bd. of Trs. v. Browning, 387 So. 3d 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…