Robert Velazco v. The State of Florida

No. 3D24-1120 · Florida Third District Court of Appeal · May 21, 2025 · No. No. 3D24-1120

Summary

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the summary denial of Robert Velazco’s first and third postconviction claims under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. It reversed and remanded as to the second claim, directing the trial court either to attach documents conclusively refuting the claim or to conduct an evidentiary hearing.

Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Writing for the Court
Miller, J.; Fernandez, J.; Lindsey, J.
Jurisdiction
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Decision date
May 21, 2025
Docket number
No. 3D24-1120
Procedural posture
Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from a summary denial of a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief.
Standard of review
Appellate review of a summary denial of a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief; a summary denial is proper only when the record and attachments conclusively refute the claim.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Robert Velazco v. The State of Florida
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded

Topics

post-conviction reliefstate post-conviction reliefappellate procedurecriminal procedureineffective assistance

Practice areas

criminal procedurepost-conviction reliefappellate procedureineffective assistance

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the summary denial of Velazco's first and third postconviction claims should be affirmed.
  2. Whether the summary denial of the second postconviction claim was proper when the record did not conclusively refute the claim.

Holdings

  1. The denial of Velazco's first and third claims was affirmed.
  2. The trial court could not summarily deny the second claim unless the record conclusively refuted it; the court was required either to attach documents conclusively refuting the claim or conduct an evidentiary hearing.

Key quotations

postconviction proceedings cannot serve as a second appeal. (at 1)
we are constrained to reverse the denial of the second claim with instructions for the trial court to either attach documents that conclusively refute the claim or conduct an evidentiary hearing (at 2)

Factual background

Velazco sought postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and raised three claims. The second claim concerned alleged misadvice about the consequences of testifying at trial, specifically whether the State could inquire into the specifics or nature of his prior felony convictions. Velazco alleged that, absent the alleged misadvice, he would have testified differently or testified in his own defense.

Procedural history

Velazco filed a motion for postconviction relief raising three claims. The Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County summarily denied the motion. On appeal, the Third District affirmed the denial of the first and third claims, but reversed the denial of the second claim and remanded for attachment of documents conclusively refuting that claim or an evidentiary hearing.

Remand instructions

For the second claim, the trial court must either attach documents that conclusively refute the claim or conduct an evidentiary hearing. The denials of the first and third claims remain affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…