Summary
The Third District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the trial court in an action involving whether the plaintiff's claims were subject to Florida's medical-malpractice presuit notice and statute-of-limitations provisions. The court concluded that the claims arose from medical care or services and cited sections 95.11(4)(b) and 766.106, Florida Statutes, along with related Florida appellate decisions.
Holdings
- A claim sounds in medical malpractice when it arises out of medical diagnosis, treatment, or care rendered by a healthcare provider and the conduct at issue is directly related to medical care or services requiring professional judgment or skill. Such a claim is subject to the applicable medical-malpractice statutory requirements, including presuit screening and notice.
Questions Presented
- Whether the claim was an action for medical malpractice or medical negligence subject to Florida's medical-malpractice statutory provisions, including the presuit notice requirements of section 766.106.
- Whether the claim's characterization should be determined from the well-pleaded allegations and the nature of the conduct, rather than from the label assigned to the claim.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (8)
- Ramsay v. S. Lake Hosp., 357 So. 3d 253, 258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)(followed)
- Nat'l Deaf Acad., LLC v. Townes, 242 So. 3d 303, 311-12 (Fla. 2018)(followed)
- Joseph v. Univ. Behav. LLC, 71 So. 3d 913, 917 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)(followed)
- Univ. of Miami v. Bloomer, 337 So. 3d 838, 840 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)(followed)
- Dr. Navarro's Vein Ctr. of Palm Beach, Inc. v. Miller, 22 So. 3d 776, 778 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)(followed)
- Corbo v. Garcia, 949 So. 2d 366, 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)(followed)
- Martinez v. Lifemark Hosp. of Fla., Inc., 608 So. 2d 855, 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)(followed)
- Goldman v. Halifax Med. Ctr., Inc., 662 So. 2d 367, 371 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…