Stephen Sanker v. James Baptiste

Sanker · Florida Third District Court of Appeal · January 28, 2026 · No. No. 3D25-0616

Summary

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a rent deposit order and final judgment of eviction. The court held that the appellant’s failure to provide a transcript of the hearing, which included credibility determinations, left the record insufficient to establish appellate error.

Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Writing for the Court
Lindsey, J.; Logue, J.; Gordo, J.
Jurisdiction
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Decision date
January 28, 2026
Docket number
No. 3D25-0616
Procedural posture
Tenant appealed the trial court's rent deposit order and final judgment of eviction.
Standard of review
An appellate court cannot resolve factual issues or determine whether a judgment is supported by the evidence without a transcript of the relevant proceedings; credibility determinations are reviewed with deference because witness credibility is within the trial court's exclusive purview.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Stephen Sanker v. James Baptiste
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

appellate procedureevictionlandlord tenantstandard of reviewcivil procedure

Practice areas

appellate procedurelandlord-tenant lawevictioncivil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appellate court could review the trial court's rent deposit order and final judgment of eviction when the appellant failed to provide a transcript of the proceedings on which the rulings were based.
  2. Whether affirmance was required where the trial court's rent determination depended on witness credibility assessments.

Holdings

  1. When the trial court's rulings depend on factual findings or credibility assessments and the appellant fails to provide a transcript of the relevant proceedings, the appellate record is incomplete and affirmance is proper.
  2. The appellate court may not reweigh evidence or witness credibility and must defer to the trial court on credibility issues.

Key quotations

The failure to produce a transcript of the proceedings is usually fatal to a party’s appeal. (1)
Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. (1-2)
The credibility of witnesses is within the trial court's exclusive purview. It is inappropriate for an appellate court to reweigh the evidence and credibility of witnesses. And so we defer to the trial court as to issues of credibility. (2)

Factual background

The trial court determined the amount of rent to be deposited and entered a final judgment of eviction based on its assessment of the credibility and accuracy of sworn testimony at a hearing on the motion to determine rent. The tenant appealed those rulings but did not provide a transcript of the hearing or other proceedings supporting the trial court's determinations. Because the judgment depended particularly on a credibility assessment, the appellate record was inadequate to evaluate whether error occurred.

Procedural history

The Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County entered a rent deposit order and final judgment of eviction after assessing the credibility and accuracy of sworn testimony at a hearing on the motion to determine rent. The tenant appealed but did not provide a transcript of the proceedings on which the rent determination and eviction judgment were based. The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed in all respects.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…