Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a circuit court judgment in a family-law appeal. The court held that Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 and its family-law counterpart, Rule 12.540, are not appropriate vehicles for challenging a judgment based on alleged legal error, and it rejected judicial disqualification based solely on an adverse ruling.
Holdings
- Neither Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 nor its family-law equivalent, Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.540, is an appropriate vehicle to challenge a judgment based upon alleged legal error.
- The fact that a judge has ruled against a party is not, standing alone, a legally sufficient basis for disqualification.
Questions Presented
- Whether relief under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 or Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.540 is an appropriate means of challenging a judgment based on alleged legal error.
- Whether the fact that a judge ruled against a party provides a legally sufficient basis for judicial disqualification.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- Franco v. Thomas, 251 So. 3d 325, 327 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)(followed)
- Curbelo v. Ullman, 571 So. 2d 443, 445 (Fla. 1990)(followed)
- Theodorides v. Theodorides, 201 So. 3d 141, 143–44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)(followed)
- Thompson v. State, 759 So. 2d 650, 659 (Fla. 2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…