Codi Evans v. Maryland National Capital Parks & Planning Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 21, 2023 · No. 23-1475

Summary

The Fourth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for defendants on a hostile work environment racial harassment claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The court found no reversible error in the district court's dismissal of the claim. This unpublished per curiam decision upheld the lower court's ruling.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; AGEE; RICHARDSON; FLOYD
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
November 21, 2023
Docket number
23-1475
Procedural posture
Appeal from summary judgment order in the district court.
Precedential value
Unpublished
Parties
Codi Evans v. Maryland National Capital Parks & Planning Commission, Chief Darryl McSwain, Captain Michael Murphy, Michael Riley, Captain Darin Uhrig
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

civil proceduresummary judgmentappellate procedureemployment discriminationcivil rights

Practice areas

Employment LawCivil Rights

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment on Evans's hostile work environment racial harassment claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981.

Holdings

  1. The court found no reversible error and affirmed the district court's order granting summary judgment.

Key quotations

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s order. (2)
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. (2)

Factual background

Evans, an employee of the Maryland National Capital Parks & Planning Commission, brought employment-related claims including a hostile work environment racial harassment claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants.

Procedural history

Evans appealed the district court's order granting summary judgment to defendants on his employment-related claims, specifically challenging the dismissal of his hostile work environment racial harassment claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…