Forte v. Warden

Summary

This United States District Court order denies a prisoner’s motion to alter or amend judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). The court addresses arguments regarding misread timeframes for requested video surveillance and a freestanding claim of actual innocence based on newly discovered evidence, finding neither warrants reconsideration. Ultimately, the court concludes that the alleged errors did not affect the outcome and that the new evidence fails to meet the stringent standard for habeas relief.