California First Amendment Coalition; Society of Professional Journalists, Northern California Chapter v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden, San Quentin Prison; Calterhune, Director of California Department of Corrections; Arthur Calderon, Warden; James Gomez, Director, Department of Corrections

299 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 2002) · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · August 2, 2002 · No. No. 00-16752

Summary

The Ninth Circuit held that the public and press have a First Amendment right to view a California lethal-injection execution from the time the condemned inmate is escorted into the execution chamber, including the restraint and insertion of intravenous lines. Applying a deferential prison-regulation standard, the court concluded that San Quentin's Procedure 770 was an exaggerated response to legitimate prison safety concerns. The court affirmed the permanent injunction requiring uninterrupted viewing through the declaration of death.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Fisher, Circuit Judge; Bright, Senior Circuit Judge, sitting by designation; B. Fletcher, Circuit Judge
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
August 2, 2002
Docket number
No. 00-16752
Procedural posture
Appeal from the Northern District of California's post-trial judgment and permanent injunction invalidating San Quentin Institutional Procedure 770, which restricted public and press viewing of lethal-injection executions.
Standard of review
De novo review of the constitutionality of Procedure 770 and the district court's legal conclusions and mixed questions of law and fact; clear-error review of factual findings.
Precedential value
published precedential Ninth Circuit opinion
Parties
Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden, San Quentin Prison, Calterhune, Director of California Department of Corrections v. California First Amendment Coalition, Society of Professional Journalists, Northern California Chapter
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

first amendmentfree speechprisoners rightscriminal procedureconstitutional law

Practice areas

constitutional lawcivil rightsprison lawcapital punishment

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the First Amendment gives the public and press a qualified right to view a California lethal-injection execution from the condemned inmate's entry into the execution chamber, including restraint and insertion of intravenous lines.
  2. What standard governs review of a prison regulation restricting outsiders' access to an execution.
  3. Whether San Quentin Institutional Procedure 770 was reasonably related to legitimate penological interests or instead constituted an exaggerated response to prison officials' safety and security concerns.

Holdings

  1. The public and press have a First Amendment right to view California lethal-injection executions from the moment the condemned inmate is escorted into the execution chamber, including the initial procedures that are inextricably intertwined with carrying out the execution.
  2. The court applied the deferential Turner framework, informed by the requirement of a closer fit where the regulation broadly restricts outsiders' access and does not require substantial case-by-case discretion.
  3. Procedure 770 was unconstitutional because it was an exaggerated response to legitimate concerns about execution-team safety and institutional security.

Key quotations

the public does indeed enjoy a First Amendment right of access to view executions from the moment the condemned is escorted into the execution chamber. (¶ 10)
We therefore hold that the public enjoys a First Amendment right to view executions from the moment the condemned is escorted into the execution chamber, including those "initial procedures" that are inextricably intertwined with the process of putting the condemned inmate to death. (¶ 22)
Procedure 770 is unconstitutional. (¶ 53)

Factual background

California conducted lethal-injection executions in a sealed chamber at San Quentin Prison. Procedure 770 barred witnesses from viewing the condemned inmate's entry into the chamber, restraint on the gurney, insertion of intravenous lines, and the period before execution staff left the chamber. Historically, public and media witnesses had been permitted to observe California executions from the condemned person's entry through the pronouncement of death. The district court found that concealing execution staff was not supported by evidence of actual threats or retaliation and that surgical garb offered a practical alternative to the viewing restriction.

Procedural history

Plaintiffs challenged Procedure 770 after the first California lethal-injection execution and obtained a preliminary injunction. The district court later granted summary judgment to plaintiffs, but the Ninth Circuit reversed on the then-existing record and remanded for determination whether the restriction was an exaggerated response to prison security and staff-safety concerns. After a two-day bench trial, the district court again found Procedure 770 unconstitutional and entered a permanent injunction. The defendants appealed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…