United States v. Bradford

United States v. Bradford · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · August 4, 2025 · No. 23-4111

Summary

The Ninth Circuit affirmed Donavin Dwayne Bradford’s convictions and life sentence for offenses related to sex trafficking, including trafficking minors. The court held that advertising a minor for commercial sex under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 is an alternative means of committing a single offense, not a separate crime, so the relevant indictment counts were not duplicitous. The court also rejected Bradford’s procedural and substantive challenges to his sentence.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Bridget S. Bade; Jay S. Bybee; Sandra S. Ikuta
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decision date
August 4, 2025
Docket number
23-4111
Procedural posture
Bradford appealed his jury convictions on Counts 1 and 2 of the first superseding indictment and his life sentence. He challenged the counts as duplicitous and argued that his sentence was procedurally and substantively unreasonable.
Standard of review
The court reviewed the denial of the motion to dismiss the allegedly duplicitous indictment de novo. It reviewed the unpreserved procedural sentencing objection for plain error and reviewed substantive reasonableness for abuse of discretion.
Precedential value
published precedential opinion
Parties
Donavin Dwayne Bradford v. United States of America
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

statutory interpretationcriminal proceduresentencingstandard of reviewappellate procedure

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal proceduresex traffickingfederal sentencingappellate law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Counts 1 and 2 of the first superseding indictment were duplicitous because they charged sex trafficking a minor through advertising together with other statutory means of sex trafficking.
  2. Whether the district court committed procedural sentencing error by failing to enumerate its reasons for rejecting Bradford's mitigation arguments.
  3. Whether Bradford's life sentence was substantively unreasonable in light of his personal history and life circumstances.

Holdings

  1. Sex trafficking a minor by advertising the minor for commercial sex while knowing that the minor is under eighteen is an alternative means of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1591, not a separate and distinct crime. Accordingly, Counts 1 and 2 were not duplicitous.
  2. The district court adequately explained its sentencing decision, considered the parties' arguments and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and did not commit plain error.
  3. Bradford failed to show that his life sentence was illogical, implausible, or unsupported by the record, and therefore failed to establish substantive unreasonableness.

Key quotations

Because sex trafficking a minor by advertising the minor for commercial sex with the knowledge that the minor is under the age of eighteen is merely an alternate means by which a defendant can violate § 1591, the statute defines only one offense. (at 15)
We hold that sex trafficking a minor by advertising is not a separate and distinct crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1591; rather, it is one of the various means by which the statute can be violated. (at 17)

Factual background

Bradford sex trafficked women and girls, including minors from foster placements or group homes, collected money earned through prostitution, and maintained control through violence and threats. He filmed himself having sex with some minor victims and had some of them tattooed with his aliases. The superseding indictment charged him with conspiracy and sex-trafficking offenses, including conduct involving recruiting, maintaining, and advertising a minor for commercial sex.

Procedural history

A grand jury indicted Bradford on August 11, 2022, and returned a first superseding indictment on February 24, 2023. The district court denied Bradford's motion to dismiss Counts 1 and 2 as duplicitous, the case proceeded to trial, and the jury convicted him on all nine counts. The district court imposed a life sentence, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…