Paeonian Ents., L.L.C. v. Fitworks Holding, L.L.C.

2026-Ohio-379 · Ohio First District Court of Appeals · February 6, 2026 · No. C-250058

Summary

The Ohio First District Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for a commercial landlord in an action seeking damages for a tenant's breach of lease. The court held that the tenant breached the lease by failing to pay rent, did not validly exercise an early buyout option, and failed to establish that the landlord breached the agreement. The court also held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing the landlord additional time to file its summary-judgment motion.

Holdings

  1. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting Paeonian a short extension to conduct limited discovery and file a dispositive motion after Fitworks's summary-judgment motion had been briefed.
  2. Paeonian was entitled to summary judgment because the undisputed evidence established a valid lease, Fitworks's failure to pay rent, and resulting damages, with no genuine dispute of material fact.
  3. Summary judgment for Paeonian on Fitworks's breach-of-contract counterclaim was proper because Fitworks presented no evidence that Paeonian breached the lease or addendum, and Fitworks failed to satisfy the conditions of the early buyout option.
  4. The court declined to address the first assignment because Fitworks did not separately brief it and voluntarily abandoned it at oral argument.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by granting Paeonian additional time to conduct limited discovery and file a summary-judgment motion after Fitworks's motion had been filed and fully briefed.
  2. Whether summary judgment was proper for Paeonian on its breach-of-lease claim where Fitworks stopped paying rent but continued occupying the premises.
  3. Whether Fitworks could prevail on its counterclaim for breach of contract based on Paeonian's alleged failure to renegotiate lease terms or honor the early buyout option.
  4. Whether Fitworks's abandoned first assignment of error should be addressed.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (14)

  • Murphy v. Murphy, 2012-Ohio-793, ¶ 6 (9th Dist.)(followed)
  • Hamilton v. Ohio Savings Bank, 82 Ohio St.3d 67, 70 (1998)(followed)
  • Jones v. Murphy, 12 Ohio St.3d 84, 87 (1984)(followed)
  • State v. Maynard, 2023-Ohio-4619, ¶ 22 (1st Dist.)(followed)
  • Sonis v. Rasner, 2015-Ohio-3028, ¶ 40 (8th Dist.)(followed)
  • Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. v. Ryan, 2014-Ohio-3932, ¶ 30 (10th Dist.)(followed)
  • Brinkman v. Toledo, 81 Ohio App.3d 429, 432 (6th Dist. 1992)(followed)
  • Collett v. Sharkey, 2021-Ohio-2823, ¶ 8 (1st Dist.)(followed)
  • Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co., 77 Ohio St.3d 102, 105 (1996)(followed)
  • Al Neyer, LLC v. Westfield Ins. Co., 2020-Ohio-5417, ¶¶ 14-15 (1st Dist.)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…