Buller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Buller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · November 26, 2025 · No. 24-1557

Summary

The Second Circuit held that the 90-day filing deadline in Internal Revenue Code § 6213(a) for petitions to the Tax Court is a nonjurisdictional claim-processing rule rather than a jurisdictional limitation. The court further held that the deadline is presumptively subject to equitable tolling, reversed the Tax Court’s dismissal, and remanded for consideration of whether the petitioners were entitled to equitable tolling.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Writing for the Court
Richard J. Sullivan; José A. Cabranes; Mihël Lohier Jr.
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decision date
November 26, 2025
Docket number
24-1557
Procedural posture
Petitioners appealed the United States Tax Court's dismissal of their petition for lack of jurisdiction after they filed nine days late under I.R.C. § 6213(a).
Standard of review
De novo review of the Tax Court's dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and of whether a statutory deadline is subject to equitable tolling.
Precedential value
published and precedential
Parties
Mark Buller, Sarah Beatty v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded

Topics

tax court proceduretax deficiencystatutory interpretationappellate procedureequitable relief

Practice areas

Federal taxTax Court procedureAppellate procedureStatutory interpretationEquitable remedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the ninety-day filing deadline in I.R.C. § 6213(a) is jurisdictional or instead a nonjurisdictional claim-processing rule.
  2. Whether the filing deadline in I.R.C. § 6213(a) is subject to equitable tolling.

Holdings

  1. The filing deadline in I.R.C. § 6213(a) is a nonjurisdictional claim-processing rule rather than a limitation on the Tax Court's adjudicatory jurisdiction.
  2. The filing deadline in I.R.C. § 6213(a) is subject to equitable tolling.

Key quotations

Because Congress has not clearly imbued the filing deadline in section 6213(a) with jurisdictional consequences, we hold that it is a nonjurisdictional, claim-processing rule. (6)
For all these reasons, we hold that the filing deadline in section 6213(a) is – quite clearly – a nonjurisdictional, claim-processing rule. (10)
Accordingly, we hold that section 6213(a)’s filing deadline is subject to equitable tolling. (13)

Factual background

The IRS sent Mark Buller and Sarah Beatty a notice of deficiency concerning their 2018 income-tax returns on August 22, 2022. Their counsel missed the ninety-day deadline in I.R.C. § 6213(a), and the petition was filed nine days late. The Tax Court found that the notice was properly mailed and dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Procedural history

The IRS mailed Petitioners a notice of deficiency concerning their 2018 income-tax returns on August 22, 2022. Petitioners filed their Tax Court petition nine days after the ninety-day statutory deadline. The Tax Court dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction, and Petitioners timely appealed. The Second Circuit reversed and remanded for the Tax Court to consider equitable tolling.

Remand instructions

The Tax Court must consider in the first instance whether Petitioners are entitled to equitable tolling of the I.R.C. § 6213(a) filing deadline.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…