Knox v. CRC Management Co.

134 F.4th 39 (2d Cir. 2025) · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · April 9, 2025 · No. 23-121

Summary

This Second Circuit Court of Appeals opinion vacates and remands a district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of an employer in an employment dispute. The plaintiff alleged discriminatory and retaliatory termination, a hostile work environment, failure to accommodate a disability, and unpaid wages. The appellate court found sufficient evidence in the record to create genuine factual disputes on all claims, reversing the lower court’s dismissal and ordering further proceedings.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Writing for the Court
Kearse; Park; Pérez
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decision date
April 9, 2025
Docket number
23-121
Procedural posture
Appeal from summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims
Standard of review
de novo
Precedential value
published
Parties
Natasha Knox v. CRC Management Co., LLC; Clean Rite Centers-3533 Boston Rd., LLC; 4352 Bronx Blvd. Laundromat, LLC; Cecilia Ashmeade; Ken Ferris
Disposition
vacated

Topics

employment discriminationtitle viidisability discriminationwage and hourappellate procedure

Practice areas

employment lawcivil rights

Questions Presented

  1. Whether summary judgment was proper on plaintiff's claims of racial/national‑origin discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment, disability discrimination, and wage‑and‑hour violations against Clean Rite.
  2. Whether the district court’s dismissal of claims against individual defendants Ashmeade and Ferris should be reinstated.

Holdings

  1. Summary judgment was improper; the district court’s judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings on each of Knox’s claims.
  2. The dismissal is vacated; the claims against Ashmeade and Ferris are reinstated for the district court to consider on remand.

Key quotations

We cannot conclude that any of her claims were so lacking in support as to prevent a reasonable jury from finding in her favor. (*10)
A rational jury could reasonably infer that Knox’s race or national origin played at least some part, even if not the only part, in her firing. (*13)

Factual background

From December 2018 to April 2019 Natasha Knox worked as a customer‑service attendant for Clean Rite laundromats in the Bronx. She complained to supervisors about daily racially derogatory comments and about her doctor’s instruction not to lift more than 25 pounds due to a thumb injury. After taking $15 from a cash register to reimburse taxi fare with permission, she was confronted, refused to return the money, and was terminated three days later.

Procedural history

Plaintiff sued for discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment, failure to accommodate disability, and wage-and-hour violations. The district court granted summary judgment for Clean Rite and dismissed claims against individual supervisors. Plaintiff appealed.

Remand instructions

Remand for further proceedings on each of Knox’s claims, including reconsideration of the motion to strike the answer and for default judgment against Ashmeade and Ferris.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…