State of Louisiana v. Cristian Jose Vargas Borbon

No. 56,723-KA · Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit · December 10, 2025 · No. 56,723-KA

Summary

The Louisiana Second Circuit affirmed Cristian Jose Vargas Borbon’s conviction for indecent behavior with a juvenile, victim under age 13, and his 12-year sentence at hard labor, including two years without benefits. The court held that the victim’s statements and trial evidence were sufficient under the Jackson v. Virginia standard to support the conviction. The court also held that the sentence was not constitutionally excessive.

Court
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Writing for the Court
Thompson, J.; Pitman, J.; Cox, J.
Jurisdiction
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Decision date
December 10, 2025
Docket number
56,723-KA
Procedural posture
Borbon appealed his conviction for indecent behavior with a juvenile, victim under age 13, and his accompanying twelve-year sentence, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the constitutional excessiveness of the sentence.
Standard of review
For sufficiency of the evidence, the court viewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and asked whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements proven beyond a reasonable doubt under Jackson v. Virginia. The court did not reassess witness credibility or reweigh evidence. For sentence excessiveness, the court applied Louisiana's two-pronged review: whether the trial court considered the factors in La. C. Cr. P. art. 894.1 and whether the sentence is constitutionally excessive.
Precedential value
Published Louisiana Court of Appeal opinion
Parties
Cristian Jose Vargas Borbon v. State of Louisiana
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

criminal procedureevidencesentencingcruel and unusual punishmentappellate procedure

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal procedureappellate practicesentencingconstitutional law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence was sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Borbon committed indecent behavior with a juvenile under age thirteen.
  2. Whether Borbon's twelve-year sentence, including two years without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence, was constitutionally excessive under the Eighth Amendment and article I, section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution.

Holdings

  1. The evidence was sufficient to support Borbon's conviction because J.G.'s unequivocal account that Borbon touched and rubbed his private part over his clothing, if believed by the jury, established the elements of indecent behavior with a juvenile beyond a reasonable doubt.
  2. Borbon's twelve-year sentence was not constitutionally excessive under the Eighth Amendment or article I, section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution.

Key quotations

J.G.’s testimony alone satisfies the elements of indecent behavior with a juvenile under La. R.S. 14:81(A)(1) and sufficiently proves Borbon’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. (7)
Borbon’s mid-range sentence for indecent behavior with a juvenile, victim under age 13, is not constitutionally excessive and is appropriate in this case. (9)

Factual background

J.G., who was under thirteen, disclosed that Borbon, his paternal step-grandfather by marriage, touched and rubbed J.G.'s private part over his clothing. J.G. made the disclosure to his mother and later gave a forensic interview in which he described the touching on Mother's Day and similar conduct at bedtime. At trial, J.G. testified that his forensic-interview statements were true, while Borbon denied touching him inappropriately. The jury credited J.G.'s account and convicted Borbon.

Procedural history

Borbon was charged in the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District Court for Bossier Parish with indecent behavior with a juvenile under La. R.S. 14:81(A) and (H)(2). Following a joint trial involving charges concerning two sibling victims, the jury found him guilty as charged on July 11, 2024. The trial court sentenced him on December 10, 2024, to twelve years at hard labor, including two years without benefits, consecutive to a life sentence imposed in the companion first-degree-rape case. The Louisiana Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, affirmed the conviction and sentence.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…