State of Louisiana v. Joshua Jones

No. 56,719-KA · Louisiana Court of Appeal, Second Circuit · December 17, 2025 · No. 56,719-KA

Summary

The Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed Joshua Jones's conviction for molestation of a juvenile and his seven-year sentence at hard labor. The court held that the trial court adequately considered the sentencing guidelines under La. C. Cr. P. art. 894.1 and that the sentence was not constitutionally excessive. The court emphasized the victim's age, Jones's supervisory position, and the nature of the conduct.

Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal, Second Circuit
Writing for the Court
Pitman, C.J.; Stone, J.; Cox, J.
Jurisdiction
Louisiana Court of Appeal, Second Circuit
Decision date
December 17, 2025
Docket number
56,719-KA
Procedural posture
After a jury convicted Joshua Jones of molestation of a juvenile and the trial court sentenced him to seven years at hard labor, Jones appealed, arguing that the sentence was constitutionally excessive.
Standard of review
An appellate court first determines whether the trial court adequately complied with La. C. Cr. P. art. 894.1 and particularized the sentence. It then determines whether the sentence is constitutionally excessive. Within statutory limits, the trial court has wide sentencing discretion, and the sentence will not be disturbed absent a manifest abuse of that discretion.
Precedential value
Published Louisiana Court of Appeal opinion
Parties
Joshua Jones v. State of Louisiana
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

sentencingcriminal procedurestandard of reviewappellate procedurecruel and unusual punishment

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal sentencingappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court adequately complied with La. C. Cr. P. art. 894.1 and sufficiently particularized Jones's sentence.
  2. Whether Jones's seven-year sentence at hard labor for molestation of a juvenile was constitutionally excessive.

Holdings

  1. The trial court adequately considered the sentencing guidelines and particularized the sentence to Jones.
  2. Jones's seven-year sentence at hard labor was not constitutionally excessive and did not constitute a manifest abuse of the trial court's sentencing discretion.

Key quotations

The trial judge need not articulate every aggravating and mitigating circumstance outlined in La. C. Cr. P. art. 894.1, but the record must reflect that he adequately considered these guidelines in particularizing the sentence to the defendant. (4)
The trial court has wide discretion in the imposition of sentences within statutory limits, and the sentence imposed should not be set aside as excessive in the absence of a manifest abuse of discretion. (4)
The sentence imposed is not grossly out of proportion to the seriousness of the offense when considering the ages of Defendant and the minor victim, Defendant’s position of influence over the victim as her supervisor and Defendant’s lascivious acts upon the victim. (5)

Factual background

Sixteen-year-old A.S. worked at a Pizza Hut where Jones, then 47, was her manager. During a period when they were alone, Jones twice picked A.S. up and pulled or pushed her into a freezer, putting his hands down her shirt and inside her bra and touching her breasts and nipples. A.S. reported the incident shortly afterward while visibly upset, and security-camera recordings corroborated the sequence of events. Jones had a limited criminal history consisting of a 1994 simple-burglary conviction.

Procedural history

The State charged Jones by bill of information with molestation of a juvenile under La. R.S. 14:81.2(A)(1) and (B)(1). A jury found him guilty as charged on February 26, 2025. Following a May 29, 2025 sentencing hearing, the Twenty-Sixth Judicial District Court for Bossier Parish imposed seven years at hard labor with credit for time served. The Louisiana Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, affirmed the conviction and sentence.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…