United States v. Mackey

143 F.4th 129 (2d Cir. 2025) · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · July 9, 2025 · No. 23-7577

Summary

This Second Circuit Court of Appeals opinion reverses the defendant's criminal conviction for conspiring to violate voting rights under 18 U.S.C. § 241 after he posted text-to-vote memes on Twitter. The court held that the government failed to present sufficient evidence that the defendant knowingly agreed with others to commit the charged offense, as required for a conspiracy conviction. Consequently, the appellate court remanded the case with instructions to enter a judgment of acquittal.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Writing for the Court
Debra Ann Livingston, Chief Judge; Raggi, Circuit Judge; Robinson, Circuit Judge
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decision date
July 9, 2025
Docket number
23-7577
Procedural posture
Mackey appealed from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He challenged, among other issues, the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 241.
Standard of review
The court reviewed the sufficiency of the evidence de novo, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and asking whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Precedential value
Published precedential opinion
Parties
Douglass Mackey, aka Ricky Vaughn v. United States of America
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded

Topics

criminal procedureelection lawevidencestandard of reviewappellate procedure

Practice areas

criminal lawcriminal procedureappellate practiceelection lawconstitutional rights

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mackey knowingly entered into and participated in a conspiracy to injure citizens in the exercise of their right to vote under 18 U.S.C. § 241.
  2. Whether Mackey's posting or reposting of text-to-vote memes, without proof that he was aware of the alleged conspiratorial discussions or shared the alleged conspirators' unlawful purpose, established the required agreement.

Holdings

  1. The evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that Mackey knowingly entered into an agreement with others to injure citizens in the exercise of their right to vote. His posting or reposting of text-to-vote memes, without evidence that he viewed or participated in the relevant conspiratorial discussions, did not prove knowing participation in the conspiracy.
  2. Evidence that Mackey may individually have intended to mislead voters, or that he retweeted another text-to-vote meme, did not establish the unlawful agreement required for a conspiracy under Section 241.

Key quotations

Section 241 criminalizes only conspiracies between “two or more persons.” (143 F.4th 129)
A Section 241 conviction requires proof that the defendant knowingly entered into an unlawful agreement. (143 F.4th 129)
His “mere association with those implicated in an unlawful undertaking is not enough to prove knowing involvement.” (143 F.4th 129)

Factual background

Mackey posted or reposted three Twitter memes shortly before the 2016 presidential election falsely suggesting that Hillary Clinton supporters could vote by text message. Similar memes and strategies had been discussed in private Twitter message groups, including the War Room, but the government did not establish that Mackey viewed or participated in those discussions. Mackey testified that he obtained the memes from the public website 4chan, and the government presented no evidence that his posts caused anyone to cast an invalid ballot.

Procedural history

A grand jury indicted Mackey on one count of conspiring to injure, oppress, threaten, and intimidate persons in the exercise of their right to vote. After a five-day jury trial, the jury found him guilty on March 31, 2023. The district court denied his post-trial motion challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, sentenced him principally to seven months in prison, and entered judgment on October 25, 2023. The Second Circuit reversed the conviction and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment of acquittal.

Remand instructions

The district court was instructed to enter a judgment of acquittal.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…