United States v. Robinson

134 F.4th 104 (2d Cir. 2025) · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · April 14, 2025 · No. 23-8022-cr

Summary

This Second Circuit opinion addresses Defendant-Appellant Darrell Robinson's appeal of a special condition of supervised release requiring searches of his electronic devices upon reasonable suspicion. Robinson argued the condition was not orally pronounced at sentencing, procedurally unreasonable, and violated the Fourth Amendment. The court affirmed the district court's judgment, finding that the oral pronouncement sufficiently referenced the Presentence Investigation Report, the need for the condition was self-evident given Robinson's extensive criminal history and dishonesty, and the reasonable-suspicion standard complied with Fourth Amendment protections for supervisees.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Writing for the Court
Livingston; Leval; Nathan
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decision date
April 14, 2025
Docket number
23-8022-cr
Procedural posture
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, No. 1:22-cr-403-1, affirming a sentencing judgment that imposed a special condition of supervised release requiring electronic searches.
Standard of review
de novo for legal issues; plain error for procedural reasonableness; abuse of discretion for constitutional challenge
Precedential value
published
Parties
Darrell Robinson v. United States
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

fourth amendmentsearch and seizureprocedural due processappellate jurisdictioncriminal procedure

Practice areas

criminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the special electronic search condition was properly pronounced at sentencing.
  2. Whether the district court's failure to state reasons for the condition was procedurally unreasonable.
  3. Whether the electronic search condition violates the Fourth Amendment.

Holdings

  1. The district court properly imposed the electronic search condition; the challenge fails and the condition stands.
  2. The failure to articulate individualized reasons is harmless error; the condition is upheld.
  3. The electronic search condition does not violate the Fourth Amendment because it is limited to searches upon reasonable suspicion and is justified by the special‑needs doctrine applicable to supervised release.

Key quotations

We generally review the imposition of conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.
The condition must be sufficiently narrowly tailored to pass constitutional muster under the special‑needs doctrine.

Factual background

Law enforcement stopped Robinson's vehicle on August 8, 2022 and seized six firearms. Robinson pleaded guilty to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). At sentencing the court imposed a 50‑month prison term and a three‑year supervised release term with a special condition requiring searches of his person, property, residence, vehicle, and electronic devices upon reasonable suspicion of a violation.

Procedural history

Robinson pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, was sentenced to 50 months imprisonment and a three‑year supervised release term with a special search condition. He challenged the electronic search portion of that condition on oral pronouncement, procedural reasonableness, and Fourth Amendment grounds. The district court denied his motion to strike the condition; Robinson appealed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…