Summary
The Louisiana Second Circuit affirmed Jimmy Ray Cockerhem’s conviction for second degree murder and mandatory life sentence without parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. The court held that the evidence was sufficient for a rational jury to find that the homicide was not committed in self-defense. It also rejected challenges concerning the exclusion of impeachment-related testimony and the constitutionality of the mandatory sentence.
Topics
Practice areas
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Cockerhem did not act in self-defense when he shot Lee.
- Whether the trial court improperly refused to allow the defense to proffer testimony from Theardis Owens concerning an alleged prior inconsistent statement by defense witness Michael Wilson.
- Whether Cockerhem's mandatory sentence of life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence was constitutionally excessive.
Holdings
- The evidence was sufficient for a rational juror to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the homicide was not committed in self-defense. The eyewitness testimony supported a finding that Cockerhem was the aggressor, approached Lee with a gun, and shot him without provocation.
- The trial court did not err in refusing to allow the defense to proffer Owens's testimony concerning Wilson's alleged statement that Lee had attempted to strike Cockerhem with a shovel.
- Cockerhem's mandatory sentence of life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence for second degree murder was not constitutionally excessive.
Key quotations
“Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we find that any rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that this homicide was not committed in self-defense.” (at 10)
“The mandatory sentence of life imprisonment for a conviction of second degree murder is presumed to be constitutional, and Defendant failed to demonstrate that he is an “exceptional” defendant for whom a downward departure from the statutory minimum sentence is required.” (at 15)
Factual background
Cockerhem shot Gary Lee in Caddo Parish after approaching Lee across a vacant lot while carrying a handgun. The eyewitness, Pamela Burns, testified that Cockerhem walked toward Lee, who was raking leaves, and shot him without provocation; she did not see Lee wield a shovel. Cockerhem testified that Lee had threatened him and was approaching him with a shovel, but the jury rejected his self-defense claim. After the shooting, Cockerhem left the scene and discarded the firearm in Twelve Mile Bayou.
Procedural history
Cockerhem was indicted in the First Judicial District Court for the Parish of Caddo for second degree murder arising from the shooting death of Gary Lee. After a jury trial, he was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment without benefits. The trial court denied his motion to reconsider sentence, and the Louisiana Second Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence.