Summary
On rehearing, the Louisiana Second Circuit considered whether the defendant's sentence complied with statutory requirements concerning the denial of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence under La. R.S. 14:35.3. The court held that imposing one year without benefits satisfied the statute and affirmed the original sentence in its entirety.
Topics
Practice areas
Questions Presented
- Whether La. R.S. 14:35.3(C) required the district court to impose at least forty-eight hours of the sentence without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence despite the silence of subsection (L) concerning denial of benefits.
- Whether the district court's imposition of one year without benefits complied with the statute.
Holdings
- La. R.S. 14:35.3(C) required the district court to impose at least forty-eight hours of the sentence without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence, notwithstanding subsection (L)'s silence concerning denial of benefits.
- The district court's imposition of one year without benefits satisfied both portions of the statute.
Key quotations
“Despite the silence of one penalty provision, R.S. 14:35.3 (L), with respect to the denial of benefits, another subsection, 14:35.3 (C), required the district court to impose “at least forty-eight hours of the sentence” without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence.” (unpaginated)
“On rehearing, we find the district court’s imposition of one year without benefits satisfied both portions of the statute. The original sentence is affirmed in its entirety.” (unpaginated)
Factual background
The district court imposed a one-year sentence without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. On rehearing, the appellate court considered whether the sentence satisfied the statutory benefit restriction in La. R.S. 14:35.3, particularly in light of the differing language in subsections (L) and (C).
Procedural history
The case was originally appealed from the First Judicial District Court for Caddo Parish, which imposed a one-year sentence without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. On rehearing, the Louisiana Court of Appeal, Second Circuit held that the sentence complied with La. R.S. 14:35.3 and affirmed the original sentence in its entirety.