United States v. Ross

Ross · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 29, 2026 · No. 25-210-cr

Summary

The Second Circuit held that Vermont's domestic assault statute, 13 V.S.A. § 1042, is divisible into three offenses and that Grace Ross's conviction involved willfully or recklessly causing bodily injury to a household member. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court concluded that this offense requires the use of physical force and therefore qualifies as a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence under 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(A), affirming Ross's conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9).

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Writing for the Court
Dennis Jacobs; José A. Cabranes; Richard C. Wesley
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decision date
May 29, 2026
Docket number
25-210-cr
Procedural posture
Ross conditionally pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont to possessing a firearm after a conviction for a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9). She appealed after the district court denied her motion to dismiss the indictment.
Standard of review
The court reviewed de novo the legal question whether Ross's prior state conviction qualifies as a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence under 18 U.S.C. §§ 921(a)(33)(A) and 922(g)(9), applying the categorical and modified categorical approaches.
Precedential value
Published Second Circuit opinion; precedential
Parties
Grace Ross v. United States of America
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

statutory interpretationcriminal procedureappellate procedure

Practice areas

criminal lawfirearms offensesappellate law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether 13 V.S.A. § 1042 is divisible into multiple offenses for purposes of the modified categorical approach.
  2. Which offense under 13 V.S.A. § 1042 underlies Ross's 2003 conviction.
  3. Whether the offense of willfully or recklessly causing bodily injury to a family or household member requires proof of the use or attempted use of physical force under 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(A)(ii), thereby qualifying as a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence under § 922(g)(9).

Holdings

  1. 13 V.S.A. § 1042 is divisible into three separate offenses: attempting to cause bodily injury to a household member; willfully or recklessly causing bodily injury to a household member; and willfully causing a household member to fear imminent serious bodily injury.
  2. Ross was convicted of willfully or recklessly causing bodily injury to a family or household member.
  3. The offense of willfully or recklessly causing bodily injury to a family or household member necessarily requires proof of the use or attempted use of physical force and therefore qualifies as a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence under 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(A)(ii).

Key quotations

For all these reasons, we conclude that 13 V.S.A. § 1042 is divisible into three offenses: (1) attempting to cause bodily injury to a household member; (2) willfully or recklessly causing bodily injury to a household member; and (3) willfully causing a household member to fear imminent serious bodily injury. (at 13)
Under those decisions, Ross’s conviction for “willfully or recklessly caus[ing] bodily injury” necessarily required proving, as an element, “the use or attempted use of physical force” under 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(33)(A)(ii). (at 16)

Factual background

In 2003, Ross pleaded guilty in Vermont state court to domestic assault under 13 V.S.A. § 1042 for assaulting her boyfriend. In 2021, Burlington police recovered a 9mm pistol from Ross's car during a traffic stop. Federal prosecutors charged her under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9), and the case turned on whether her prior Vermont conviction required proof of the use or attempted use of physical force.

Procedural history

Ross was charged federally after police recovered a firearm from her vehicle in 2021. The district court denied her motion to dismiss, she entered a conditional guilty plea reserving the issue raised on appeal, and she was sentenced to time served and one year of supervised release. The Second Circuit affirmed the judgment of conviction.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…