United States v. Porraz

No. 18-3545 (7th Cir. Nov. 27, 2019) · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · November 27, 2019 · No. No. 18-3545

Summary

The Seventh Circuit affirmed Ruben Porraz’s 188-month sentence for participating in a RICO conspiracy involving the Latin Kings. The court held that the district court properly applied the Sentencing Guidelines provision for conspiracy to commit murder because murder was reasonably foreseeable from Porraz’s gang activities. The court also concluded that the sentence was substantively reasonable and that the district court adequately addressed Porraz’s sentence-disparity arguments.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Writing for the Court
Diane P. Wood; Bauer; Rovner; Sykes
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
November 27, 2019
Docket number
No. 18-3545
Procedural posture
Porraz appealed his sentence following his guilty plea to a RICO conspiracy charge, arguing that the district court procedurally erred in calculating the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range and imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence.
Standard of review
The court reviews application and computation of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo; factual determinations underlying Guidelines application for clear error; and substantive reasonableness of the sentence for abuse of discretion. A within-Guidelines sentence is presumptively reasonable.
Precedential value
published and precedential
Parties
Ruben Porraz v. United States of America
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

sentencingsentencing guidelinesstandard of reviewappellate procedurecriminal procedure

Practice areas

criminal sentencingfederal criminal procedureappellate review

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court procedurally erred by applying U.S.S.G. § 2A1.5, the guideline for conspiracy to commit murder, rather than U.S.S.G. § 2A2.1, based on the conclusion that murder was within the scope of Porraz's conspiracy and reasonably foreseeable to him.
  2. Whether the 188-month sentence was substantively unreasonable because of alleged disparities between Porraz's sentence and the sentences of a cooperating codefendant and other Latin Kings members.

Holdings

  1. The district court properly applied U.S.S.G. § 2A1.5 because murder was a reasonably foreseeable part of Porraz's agreement with the Latin Kings, even though Porraz did not personally commit a murder.
  2. The sentence was not substantively unreasonable. The district court adequately considered and explained the differences between Porraz and the proposed comparators, and a within-Guidelines sentence could not be deemed unreasonable based on the asserted disparities.

Key quotations

For a defendant to be held accountable for the conduct of others at sentencing, that conduct must have been (1) in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity and (2) reasonably foreseeable in connection with the criminal activity that the defendant agreed to join. (7)
Murder was therefore a foreseeable part of Porraz’s agreement with gang members. (8)
Porraz has not rebutted the presumption that his within-Guidelines sentence was substantively reasonable. (10)

Factual background

Porraz was a leader, or Inca, of the 89th Street Chapter of the Latin Kings and controlled its drug-trafficking activities, firearms, and territorial defense. He admitted that gang members were expected to fight, stab, shoot, and kill rival gang members, and that he personally shot at members of a rival gang on five occasions. After pleading guilty to a RICO conspiracy, he received a 188-month sentence based on the Guidelines provision for conspiracy to commit murder.

Procedural history

Porraz was indicted on one count of conspiracy to violate RICO, pleaded guilty, and was sentenced by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to 188 months in prison. The district court applied the Guidelines provision for conspiracy to commit murder, resulting in a base offense level of 33 and a Guidelines range of 188 to 235 months. The Seventh Circuit affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…