United States v. Steve Briggins

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · March 6, 2019 · No. 18-1921

Summary

**Key Legal Topics:** Criminal history calculation under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(a) and (e); interpretation of whether a prior sentencing term constitutes one sentence or multiple concurrent sentences for guidelines purposes; presumption of concurrent sentences in multi-count cases. **Holding:** The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's assessment of six criminal history points for the defendant's ten prior bank robbery convictions. The court held that the 84-month term imposed in 1999 reflected ten concurrent sentences (one per robbery), not a single sentence, based on the sentencing judge's statements and the statutory presumption of concurrence. Therefore, the district court properly applied § 4A1.1(a) for three points on the first sentence and § 4A1.1(e) for three additional points on the remaining nine sentences.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Writing for the Court
Scudder; Manion; Brennan
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
March 6, 2019
Docket number
18-1921
Procedural posture
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Precedential value
Published
Parties
Steve Briggins v. United States of America
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

sentencingcriminal procedureappellate procedure

Practice areas

Criminal lawSentencing

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court erred in calculating Briggins's criminal history points by treating his 1999 sentence as multiple concurrent sentences rather than a single sentence.

Holdings

  1. The district court's calculation was correct because the 1999 sentence, in context, imposed multiple concurrent sentences for each of the ten robberies, warranting six criminal history points under U.S.S.G. §§ 4A1.1(a) and 4A1.1(e).

Factual background

Steve Briggins was convicted in 2017 of multiple bank robberies. He had previously been convicted in 1999 of ten bank robberies and sentenced to 84 months' imprisonment. At sentencing for the 2017 robberies, the district court assessed six criminal history points for the 1999 robberies: three under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(a) for one sentence, and three under § 4A1.1(e) for the remaining nine sentences, treating the 1999 sentence as multiple concurrent sentences. Briggins argued he received a single 84-month sentence, warranting only three points.

Procedural history

The defendant pleaded guilty to multiple bank robberies in 2017 and appealed the district court's calculation of criminal history points based on his prior 1999 bank robbery sentences.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…