Alfred Bourgeois v. T.J. Watson

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · December 1, 2020 · No. 20-1891

Summary

Seventh Circuit denied rehearing en banc in a death penalty case where petitioner claimed his execution would violate the Federal Death Penalty Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3596(c). The per curiam order affirmed the panel's prior ruling, with Judge Wood dissenting (joined by Judge Rovner) arguing the petitioner was entitled to a hearing on his statutory claim. The case addresses procedural challenges to execution under the FDPA and the scope of judicial review.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Writing for the Court
SYKES; EASTERBROOK; KANNE; ROVNER; WOOD; HAMILTON; BRENNAN; SCUDDER; ST. EVE
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
December 1, 2020
Docket number
20-1891
Procedural posture
On Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc
Precedential value
published
Parties
T.J. Watson, Warden, and United States of America v. Alfred Bourgeois
Disposition
other

Topics

appellate procedurehabeas corpuscriminal proceduresentencing

Key quotations

the petitioner is entitled to a hearing on his claim that his execution will violate the Federal Death Penalty Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3596(c)

Procedural history

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division, entered a judgment in favor of petitioner-appellee. The respondents-appellants appealed. The Seventh Circuit panel issued an opinion on October 6, 2020. Petitioner-appellee filed a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. This order denies the petition.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…