United States v. Deon Pugh

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · August 13, 2025 · No. 24-1650

Summary

This Seventh Circuit opinion affirms the district court's sentencing of Deon Pugh for drug conspiracy and firearm possession. The court addresses three primary challenges: Pugh's designation as a career offender, the attributed drug quantity, and a four-level leadership enhancement. Finding no ex post facto violation regarding the career-offender guideline amendment, holding that the drug quantity challenge was waived by defense counsel's prior advocacy, and concluding that factual findings sufficiently supported the leadership enhancement, the appellate court affirms the sentence.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Writing for the Court
Pryor; Easterbrook; Jackson-Akiwumi
Jurisdiction
Seventh Circuit
Decision date
August 13, 2025
Docket number
24-1650
Procedural posture
Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, No. 18-CR-157-4.
Standard of review
clear error for factual findings; de novo for legal issues
Precedential value
published
Parties
Deon Pugh v. United States
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

sentencingsentencing guidelinescriminal procedureappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

criminal procedureappellate procedureconstitutional lawstatutory interpretation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court erred in designating Pugh as a career offender under the Sentencing Guidelines.
  2. Whether the district court erred in attributing to Pugh a drug quantity of over 1,000 grams of heroin.
  3. Whether the district court properly applied a four‑level leadership enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines.

Holdings

  1. The district court properly designated Pugh as a career offender because the 2023 amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(d) includes inchoate offenses such as conspiracy, and the court’s deference to the Sentencing Commission’s commentary remains sound.
  2. The challenge was waived because Pugh, through his sentencing memoranda, expressly advocated for the district court’s attribution of 2,236 grams of heroin.
  3. The district court properly applied the four‑level leadership enhancement because the factual findings supported Pugh’s role as an organizer/leader and were not clearly erroneous.

Key quotations

A defendant is a career offender if (1) the defendant was at least eighteen years old at the time the defendant committed the instant offense of conviction; (2) the instant offense of conviction is a felony that is either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense; and (3) the defendant has at least two prior felony convictions of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense.

Factual background

Pugh participated in a drug conspiracy with eight co‑defendants, delivering heroin from a leader’s home. He was found guilty on all counts after a bench trial. The sentencing court calculated a base offense level and applied enhancements for leadership, drug quantity, and career‑offender status.

Procedural history

The district court convicted Pugh of four counts, including conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, and sentenced him to 216 months imprisonment. Pugh appealed the sentencing enhancements concerning career‑offender designation, drug‑quantity calculation, and a four‑level leadership enhancement.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…