Gartha C. Conley v. National Mines Corporation, Old Republic Insurance Company, and Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

595 F.3d 297 (6th Cir. 2010) · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · February 12, 2010 · No. 09-3039

Summary

The Sixth Circuit reviewed the Benefits Review Board’s reversal of an award of survivor’s black-lung benefits under the Black Lung Benefits Act. The court held that the treating physician’s conclusory opinion did not adequately establish that the miner’s legal pneumoconiosis hastened his death through a specifically defined process, and it affirmed the Board’s decision.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr., District Judge, sitting by designation; Alice M. Batchelder, Chief Judge; Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judge; Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr., Senior United States District Judge, sitting by designation
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
February 12, 2010
Docket number
09-3039
Procedural posture
Petition for review of a Benefits Review Board order reversing an Administrative Law Judge's award of survivor's black lung benefits.
Standard of review
The Sixth Circuit reviews legal issues de novo and defers to relevant factual findings supported by substantial evidence. It reviews whether the Benefits Review Board correctly concluded that the ALJ's decision lacked sufficient evidentiary support under the governing legal standards. Failure to apply the correct legal standard is reviewed plenarily.
Precedential value
published and precedential
Parties
Gartha C. Conley v. National Mines Corporation, Old Republic Insurance Company, Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

administrative lawjudicial review of agency actionstandard of reviewmineralsappellate procedure

Practice areas

administrative lawworkers' compensationcoal miners' benefitsappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Benefits Review Board correctly concluded that the treating physician's opinion was legally insufficient to establish that pneumoconiosis hastened the miner's death.
  2. What evidentiary showing is required under 20 C.F.R. § 718.205(c)(5) and Eastover Mining Co. v. Williams to prove that legal pneumoconiosis hastened death.

Holdings

  1. A conclusory medical opinion that pneumoconiosis generally reduces respiratory reserve and makes a person less able to withstand a serious illness is legally insufficient to prove that pneumoconiosis hastened death under 20 C.F.R. § 718.205(c)(5). The opinion must identify a specifically defined process by which pneumoconiosis hastened the particular miner's death.
  2. The Benefits Review Board correctly determined that the ALJ's award was unsupported by sufficient evidence under the governing legal standard and correctly reversed the award of survivor's benefits.

Key quotations

Legal pneumoconiosis only “hastens” a death if it does so through a specifically defined process that reduces the miner’s life by an estimable time. (595 F.3d at 309)
Dr. Potter’s opinion, like that of the physician in Eastover Mining, even if medically true, is legally inadequate to support his conclusion that legal pneumoconiosis hastened Dave Conley’s death. (595 F.3d at 311)

Factual background

Dave Conley worked in coal mining and had clinical pneumoconiosis, while also having a substantial history of cigarette smoking. He developed metastatic lung cancer and died in 1996; the parties agreed that lung cancer was the principal cause of death and was related to smoking rather than coal mining. His treating physician opined generally that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reduced respiratory reserve and therefore made a difference in his ability to survive, but did not explain through a specifically defined process how or by what estimable period pneumoconiosis hastened his death.

Procedural history

Gartha C. Conley filed a survivor's claim under the Black Lung Benefits Act. After an administrative hearing, the ALJ awarded benefits, finding that the decedent's legal pneumoconiosis contributed to and hastened his death. The Benefits Review Board reversed, concluding that the treating physician's opinion was insufficient under Eastover Mining Co. v. Williams. The Sixth Circuit affirmed the Review Board.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…