United States v. Dana Jackson

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · April 16, 2021 · No. 20-3765

Summary

Unpublished Sixth Circuit decision affirming a sentence for supervised release violations. The court held that the district court adequately explained the 18-month high-end guidelines sentence for violations stemming from a post-release criminal spree (carjacking, assault, firearm discharge, and felon-in-possession), satisfying the § 3553(a) factors. Procedural unreasonableness challenges were reviewed for plain error due to lack of preservation, and the discretionary substantive reasonableness ruling was affirmed under the abuse-of-discretion standard.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Writing for the Court
KETHLEDGE; STRANCH; BUSH
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
April 16, 2021
Docket number
20-3765
Procedural posture
Appeal from sentence imposed for supervised release violations and felon-in-possession conviction.
Standard of review
Plain error for unpreserved procedural reasonableness challenge; abuse of discretion for preserved substantive reasonableness challenge.
Precedential value
unpublished
Parties
Dana Jackson v. United States of America
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

criminal proceduresentencingappellate procedurestandard of reviewpreservation of error

Practice areas

Criminal LawSentencingAppellate Procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court procedurally erred by failing to explain why it sentenced Jackson at the high end of the guidelines range for his supervised release violations.
  2. Whether the district court substantively erred by imposing an unreasonable sentence of 18 months for the supervised release violations.

Holdings

  1. The district court did not commit plain error; its explanation was sufficient.
  2. The sentence was not an abuse of discretion; it was reasonable and adequately explained.

Key quotations

the court’s discussion of the § 3553(a) factors and its reference to Jackson’s 'very worrisome' spree of four different criminal offenses in the months after his July 2018 release was itself explanation enough for the court’s decision to sentence Jackson at the high end of the guidelines range. (3)
That sentence, moreover, was presumptively reasonable. (3)

Factual background

Jackson was on supervised release after serving 51 months for wire fraud, mail fraud, and aggravated identity theft. Two months after release, he possessed a stolen car from a carjacking. He then engaged in a domestic violence incident where he grabbed his ex-girlfriend's neck, punched her, and fired a gun into the air and ground. He also threatened to shoot up her house. Subsequently, while riding a motorcycle, he collided with a police cruiser, fled, and was found in possession of a firearm and ammunition. He was indicted for being a felon in possession of a firearm.

Procedural history

Jackson pled guilty to wire fraud, mail fraud, and aggravated identity theft in 2015, sentenced to 51 months and 3 years supervised release. After release in July 2018, he committed multiple crimes leading to state charges. The probation officer reported violations. Jackson also pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. The district court held a consolidated sentencing hearing and imposed a 37-month sentence for the felon-in-possession charge and an 18-month sentence for the supervised-release violations, to run consecutively. Jackson appealed, challenging the 18-month sentence.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…