Summary
The Sixth District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed Jameslee Senatus's second-degree murder judgment and sentence. The court held that evidence including the close-range shooting, failure to render aid, post-shooting statements, and suspicious conduct was sufficient for a jury to find the requisite ill will, hatred, spite, or evil intent.
Holdings
- The evidence was sufficient for a rational jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Appellant acted with ill will, hatred, spite, or evil intent toward the victim.
- A conviction is supported by sufficient evidence when, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the crime's elements beyond a reasonable doubt.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence was legally sufficient to support a finding that Appellant acted with ill will, hatred, spite, or evil intent, as required for second-degree murder.
- Whether the circuit court erred in denying Appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- Perez v. State, 187 So. 3d 1279 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)(followed)
- Poole v. State, 30 So. 3d 696 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)(followed)
- Dubois v. State, 363 So. 3d 246 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023)(followed)
- Mackey v. State, 277 So. 3d 762 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)(followed)
- Peoples v. State, 251 So. 3d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)(followed)
- Holmes v. State, 278 So. 3d 301 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)(followed)
- Mooney v. State, 403 So. 3d 407 (Fla. 1st DCA 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…