Commonwealth v. Limone

460 Mass. 834 (2011) · Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts · November 18, 2011 · No. SJC-10804

Summary

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that an off-duty, out-of-jurisdiction police officer did not arrest the defendant when he directed him to exit his vehicle, removed the keys, and asked him to wait for local police after a suspected OUI-related collision. The officer's conduct constituted a reasonable investigatory stop and preventive safety measures rather than an unlawful citizen's arrest for a misdemeanor. The court affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress and the defendant's convictions.

Court
Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Writing for the Court
Spina, J.; Ireland, C.J.; Cordy, J.; Botsford, J.; Gants, J.
Jurisdiction
Massachusetts
Decision date
November 18, 2011
Docket number
SJC-10804
Procedural posture
The Commonwealth sought further appellate review after the Appeals Court reversed the denial of Limone's motion to suppress and set aside his convictions.
Standard of review
The court accepted the motion judge's subsidiary factual findings absent clear error and independently determined whether the judge correctly applied the law to those facts.
Precedential value
Published precedential decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Parties
Commonwealth v. Joseph Limone
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

criminal proceduresuppression of evidencesearch and seizurefourth amendmentappellate procedure

Practice areas

criminal procedureconstitutional lawappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether an out-of-jurisdiction police officer acting as a private citizen unlawfully arrested Limone for a misdemeanor by directing him out of his vehicle, removing his keys, and requiring him to wait for local police.
  2. Whether evidence obtained by the Woburn police officer following the encounter had to be excluded under Massachusetts's common-law citizen's-arrest rule or the exclusionary rule.

Holdings

  1. Kelleher's conduct did not constitute an arrest. Telling Limone to step out of the vehicle, removing and retaining the keys, and directing him to wait in his car were reasonable preventive measures and an investigatory stop short of arrest.
  2. The evidence obtained by Officer Simonds did not result from an unlawful citizen's arrest and therefore did not require exclusion under Massachusetts's common-law exclusionary rule.
  3. An out-of-jurisdiction, off-duty officer's being in uniform does not alone convert a reasonable preventive interaction into an arrest, provided the officer does not use official indicia to gather evidence unavailable to a private citizen.

Key quotations

Kelleher's actions in telling the defendant to step out of the car, removing and retaining his keys from the ignition, and telling him to sit and wait in his car, fall short of an "arrest" sufficient to trigger the citizen's arrest rule. (460 Mass. at 838-839)
Kelleher did not abuse the powers of his office by taking reasonable measures, short of arrest, to ensure public safety; thus, there is nothing to deter. (460 Mass. at 843)

Factual background

While returning home in uniform in his private vehicle, Somerville Officer Robert Kelleher encountered Limone in Woburn after Limone rear-ended Kelleher's vehicle. Kelleher suspected that Limone was intoxicated, told him to exit the vehicle, removed the keys from the ignition, and instructed him to wait in his car while Kelleher called Woburn police. A Woburn officer arrived, observed additional signs of intoxication, administered field sobriety tests, and arrested Limone; subsequent testing showed a blood alcohol content of .12, and Limone had six prior OUI convictions.

Procedural history

Limone was indicted and convicted by a jury of operating under the influence, operating with a license suspended for a prior OUI, and operating with a revoked license. The Superior Court denied his motion to suppress evidence arising from an encounter with an off-duty, out-of-jurisdiction Somerville police officer. The Appeals Court reversed, but the Supreme Judicial Court granted further appellate review and affirmed the suppression ruling and convictions.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…