Estate of Jeremy Hunter v. Uintah County

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · April 3, 2020 · No. 19-4086

Summary

The Tenth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for jail officials and the county in an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim arising from an inmate's death from an aortic dissection. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish the subjective component of deliberate indifference because the jailers acted reasonably based on the inmate's fluctuating condition and medical consultations, and a misdiagnosis does not satisfy the standard. The court also held that hearsay objections not raised in the district court and municipal liability claims not argued in the opening brief were waived.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Scott M. Matheson Jr.; Paul J. Kelly Jr.; Gregory A. Phillips
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
April 3, 2020
Docket number
19-4086
Procedural posture
Appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgment
Standard of review
We review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the district court.
Precedential value
Unpublished
Parties
The Estate of Jeremy Hunter, by its personal representative, Brian Hunter v. Uintah County; Katie Smith; Cole Anderton; Richard Gowen; Caitlyn Gurr; Cody Harrison; Tony Jensen; Daren Kelly; Gale Robbins
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

civil rightssummary judgmentwaiverappellate procedure

Practice areas

Civil RightsPrisoner Civil RightsAppellate Procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court improperly relied on hearsay statements at summary judgment.
  2. Whether the individual defendants acted with deliberate indifference to Mr. Hunter's serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

Holdings

  1. The Estate waived its hearsay objection by not raising it before the district court.
  2. The Estate cannot meet the subjective component of the deliberate indifference test because no defendant subjectively knew and disregarded a substantial risk of serious harm; they took reasonable actions based on the symptoms presented.

Key quotations

We review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the district court. (at 7)
a misdiagnosis, even if rising to the level of medical malpractice, is simply insufficient under our case law to satisfy the subjective component of a deliberate indifference claim. (at 8)
Jailers who knew about a risk and acted reasonably cannot be found liable, even if the harm was not averted. (at 7)

Factual background

Jeremy Hunter was booked into Uintah County Jail on December 18, 2014, with high blood pressure and a history of heart attacks. Over the next two days, he complained of numbness, chest pain, and anxiety. Jail staff took his blood pressure, gave him medication, and monitored him. His condition fluctuated; at times he seemed better. Around 9:15 am on December 20, he collapsed and died from pericardial tamponade due to aortic dissection.

Procedural history

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants on the Estate's Eighth Amendment claim for the death of Jeremy Hunter at Uintah County Jail.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…