Calvary Albuquerque v. Rubio

Calvary Albuquerque v. Rubio · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · September 15, 2025 · No. 24-2066

Summary

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a per curiam order finding the appeal moot after the plaintiffs successfully obtained the previously denied R-1 visa for a church worship leader. The court analyzed mootness doctrines and exceptions, concluding that granting relief would have no real-world effect and no recognized exception applied. Exercising equitable discretion, the court vacated its prior panel judgment and the district court’s ruling, remanding the case with instructions to dismiss without prejudice.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Matheson; Bacharach; Federico
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decision date
September 15, 2025
Docket number
24-2066
Procedural posture
District court dismissed the complaint and denied preliminary injunction; panel affirmed; petition for rehearing en banc denied; court now vacates judgment and remands.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Calvary Albuquerque Inc.; Stefan David Grant Green; Keilah Anna Green; H.P.G., a minor v. Marco Rubio, U.S. Secretary of State; U.S. Department of State; Office of the Legal Adviser for Consular Affairs; U.S. Consulate Johannesburg; U.S. Consulate Cape Town; Unknown Consular Officer
Disposition
vacated

Topics

mootnessappellate jurisdictionappellate procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

immigrationconstitutional lawappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the case is moot after the R-1 visa was granted
  2. Whether the district court judgment should be vacated under the Munsingwear doctrine

Holdings

  1. The case is moot because the R-1 visa has been granted and there is no longer a live controversy.
  2. The district court judgment should be vacated because mootness occurred by happenstance and the judgment would otherwise have preclusive effect.

Key quotations

When a case becomes moot pending appeal, the general practice is to vacate the judgment below and remand with directions to dismiss. (at 3)
Under United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36 (1950), if mootness occurs by “happenstance”—the parties are not responsible that it happened—the judgment below should be vacated. (at 3)

Factual background

Stefan Green, a South African citizen, applied for an R-1 visa to serve as worship leader at Calvary Albuquerque church. The State Department consular officer denied the visa based on misrepresentation under 8 U.S.C. §1182(a)(6)(C)(i). Calvary sued alleging a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. While the appeal was pending, USCIS approved a new R-1 petition, CBP granted a waiver, and the consulate issued the visa.

Procedural history

The district court dismissed Calvary's R-1 visa denial claim as unreviewable. The Tenth Circuit panel affirmed the dismissal on May 6, 2025. After the visa was later granted, the parties sought rehearing en banc, which was denied. The court now finds the case moot and vacates the lower court judgment.

Remand instructions

Vacate the district court's judgment and dismiss the suit without prejudice; remand for further proceedings.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…