Karl Dean Stahmann v. State

No. 03-15-00068-CR · Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin · January 8, 2016 · No. No. 03-15-00068-CR

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, denied the appellant’s fourth motion for an extension of time to file an appellate brief. The court abated the appeal and remanded the cause to the trial court for a hearing under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8 to determine whether the appellant wished to continue the appeal, whether he was indigent, and whether counsel had abandoned the appeal.

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam; Chief Justice Rose; Justice Pemberton; Justice Field
Jurisdiction
Texas
Decision date
January 8, 2016
Docket number
No. 03-15-00068-CR
Procedural posture
Appellant's counsel sought a fourth extension of time to file the appellate brief after the court had previously granted three extensions and warned that no further extensions would be granted. The court denied the extension, abated the appeal, and remanded the cause to the trial court for a hearing under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b).
Precedential value
published
Parties
Karl Dean Stahmann v. The State of Texas
Disposition
remanded

Topics

appellate procedurecriminal procedureright to counsel

Practice areas

appellate procedurecriminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether appellant's fourth motion for an extension of time to file the appellate brief should be granted.
  2. What action is required under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b) when an appellant's brief has not been filed and counsel may have abandoned the appeal.

Holdings

  1. The fourth motion for an extension of time was denied because the court had previously granted three extensions and expressly warned that no further extensions would be granted.
  2. The appeal must be abated and remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether appellant still wishes to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether counsel has abandoned the appeal; if appellant wishes to appeal and is indigent, the trial court should enter appropriate orders to ensure adequate appellate representation.

Key quotations

We abate the cause and remand it to the trial court to hold a hearing in accordance with rule 38.8 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. (2)

Factual background

Appellant's appellate brief was originally due on March 30, 2015. The court of appeals granted three extensions, ordered counsel to file the brief by October 9, 2015, and warned that no further extensions would be granted; counsel then requested a fourth extension to January 11, 2016.

Procedural history

The appeal originated in the District Court of Comal County, 274th Judicial District, in cause number CR2011-031. After appellant's brief was not filed by the court-ordered deadline, and counsel requested another extension, the court of appeals denied the motion and remanded for a Rule 38.8(b) hearing concerning appellant's desire to prosecute the appeal, indigence, and possible abandonment by counsel.

Remand instructions

The trial court must hold a hearing under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(b) to determine whether appellant still wishes to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether counsel has abandoned the appeal. If appellant wishes to appeal and is indigent, the trial court should enter appropriate orders to ensure adequate representation on appeal. The hearing record, including all findings and orders, must be forwarded to the appellate clerk as a supplemental record no later than February 8, 2016.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…