In re Anurithi Chikkerur

No. 03-26-00336-CV · Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin · May 22, 2026 · No. 03-26-00336-CV

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, dismissed Anurithi Chikkerur’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. The court held that, as a vexatious litigant, Chikkerur was subject to statutory prefiling requirements and had failed to provide the required order permitting the original proceeding.

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin
Writing for the Court
Maggie Ellis; Justice Triana; Justice Kelly; Justice Ellis
Jurisdiction
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, Austin
Decision date
May 22, 2026
Docket number
03-26-00336-CV
Procedural posture
Original proceeding in which relator sought a writ of mandamus and temporary relief; the court dismissed both requests after relator failed to satisfy the statutory prefiling requirements applicable to vexatious litigants.
Precedential value
Published memorandum opinion; no separate precedential designation stated in the opinion.
Parties
Anurithi Chikkerur, relator v. The State of Texas, respondent
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

appellate procedurecivil procedureremedies

Practice areas

Civil procedureAppellate procedureMandamusVexatious litigant restrictions

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should dismiss a vexatious litigant's original proceeding when the relator fails to provide the court-ordered authorization required by Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code sections 11.102(a) and 11.103(a).
  2. Whether the relator's motion for temporary relief should be dismissed along with the petition for writ of mandamus after the relator failed to comply with the prefiling requirement.

Holdings

  1. A vexatious litigant's original proceeding may not proceed without the required order from the appropriate local administrative judge permitting the filing, and failure to provide that order after notice and a court order warrants dismissal.

Key quotations

To date, Chikkerur has not filed a copy of an order permitting her to file this original proceeding or otherwise complied with this Court’s order. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief.

Factual background

Anurithi Chikkerur, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. The court treated her as a vexatious litigant subject to Texas's statutory prefiling requirements. After being ordered to submit an order from the appropriate local administrative judge permitting the original proceeding, she failed to do so.

Procedural history

Chikkerur filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief in the court of appeals. The court notified her that, as a vexatious litigant, she was subject to statutory prefiling requirements and ordered her to provide an appropriate local administrative judge's order permitting the proceeding by May 15, 2026. She did not provide the order or otherwise comply, so the court dismissed the original proceeding.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…