In re Tony Ramirez

No. 03-26-00396-CV · Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin · May 7, 2026 · No. No. 03-26-00396-CV

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, dismissed Tony Ramirez’s pro se petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction. The court concluded that the requested relief constituted post-conviction habeas relief available only under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 and within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin
Writing for the Court
Karin Crump; Chief Justice Byrne; Justice Theofanis; Justice Crump
Jurisdiction
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, Austin
Decision date
May 7, 2026
Docket number
No. 03-26-00396-CV
Procedural posture
Original proceeding in which an inmate sought mandamus relief directing a respondent judge to dismiss criminal charges associated with a prior felony conviction.
Standard of review
Jurisdiction is reviewed as a threshold matter; the court determines whether the relief sought falls within its mandamus jurisdiction or within the exclusive post-conviction habeas jurisdiction of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
Precedential value
Published memorandum opinion
Parties
Tony Ramirez, Relator v. Respondent judge
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

appellate jurisdictionwrit of certiorarihabeas corpusstate post-conviction reliefcriminal procedure

Practice areas

Appellate procedureCriminal procedurePost-conviction reliefMandamus

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Texas Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to consider a mandamus petition seeking relief that could be obtained only through a post-conviction habeas application under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07.
  2. Whether Ramirez's request for leave to file the mandamus petition was moot.

Holdings

  1. A Texas court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to consider a petition styled as mandamus when the relief sought is relief available only through a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07, because the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction over post-conviction habeas relief from final felony convictions.
  2. To the extent Ramirez sought leave to file the mandamus petition, that request was moot and was denied.

Key quotations

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction to grant post-conviction habeas relief in felony cases. (1)
Because the relief that Ramirez seeks in his petition would only be available through a writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07, we are without jurisdiction to consider the petition. (1)

Factual background

Ramirez was convicted in 1992 of attempted capital murder and sentenced to sixty years' confinement. While incarcerated, he filed multiple applications for writ of habeas corpus challenging that conviction, which the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals denied. He then sought mandamus relief asking the court to direct a judge to dismiss the criminal charges in the prior case.

Procedural history

Ramirez was convicted of attempted capital murder in 1992 and sentenced to sixty years' confinement. After multiple unsuccessful post-conviction habeas applications in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he filed a pro se mandamus petition in the Texas Court of Appeals. The court concluded that the requested relief was available only through a post-conviction habeas application under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.07 and dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…