Sidni Campbell v. John Campbell, Jr.

No. 03-25-00388-CV · Texas Court of Appeals, Third District at Austin · January 22, 2026 · No. No. 03-25-00388-CV

Summary

The Texas Court of Appeals dismissed Sidni Campbell’s appeal from a Caldwell County judgment involving partition in kind of real property and determination of ownership interests. The court held that Daren Campbell could not seek greater relief without perfecting his own appeal and therefore lacked jurisdiction to consider his arguments; his motions were dismissed as moot. The court also cautioned Daren against filing hallucinated legal citations or quotations.

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District at Austin
Writing for the Court
Chari L. Kelly; Justices Triana; Ellis
Jurisdiction
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District at Austin
Decision date
January 22, 2026
Docket number
No. 03-25-00388-CV
Procedural posture
Sidni Campbell appealed a final judgment ordering partition in kind of real property and determining ownership interests. She moved to dismiss her appeal. Daren Campbell, who had not perfected his own appeal, filed motions seeking reversal or modification of portions of the judgment and greater relief for himself.
Standard of review
Jurisdictional review; the court determined whether Daren had perfected an appeal or cross-appeal sufficient to seek greater relief from the trial court's judgment.
Precedential value
Published memorandum opinion
Parties
Sidni Campbell v. John Campbell, Jr.
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

appellate jurisdictionappellate procedurecivil procedurereal estate

Practice areas

appellate procedurecivil procedurereal property

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Daren Campbell could seek reversal, modification, or greater relief from the trial court's judgment without perfecting his own appeal or cross-appeal.
  2. Whether the court of appeals had jurisdiction to consider Daren Campbell's motions after the deadline to perfect his own appeal had expired.
  3. Whether Sidni Campbell's appeal should be dismissed on her motion.

Holdings

  1. A party seeking greater relief for himself than the trial court awarded must perfect his own appeal and become an appellant in his own right; he may not obtain that relief through another party's appeal.
  2. The court lacked jurisdiction to consider Daren's arguments because he failed to perfect his own appeal by the applicable deadline and did not timely seek an extension.

Key quotations

Because he seeks greater relief for himself than what the trial court’s judgment awarded, he had to perfect his own appeal from the judgment and thus become an appellant in his own right.
Because of Daren’s failure to perfect his own appeal from the trial court’s judgment, we lack jurisdiction for anything else in this appeal other than granting Sidni’s motion to dismiss.
The appeal is dismissed, and all Daren’s motions are dismissed as moot.

Factual background

The underlying judgment ordered a partition in kind of real property under Texas Property Code chapter 23A and determined the ownership interests of approximately a dozen people, including Sidni, Daren, and John Campbell Jr. John brought the suit. Sidni appealed, but Daren did not perfect an appeal from the judgment and later attempted to obtain greater relief through motions filed in Sidni's appeal.

Procedural history

The 421st District Court of Caldwell County entered a final judgment ordering partition in kind under Texas Property Code chapter 23A and determining the ownership interests of approximately a dozen individuals. Sidni perfected an appeal, while Daren did not file a notice of appeal or cross-appeal by the applicable deadline. The court of appeals granted Sidni's motion to dismiss and dismissed Daren's motions as moot.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…